>> #trump’s a divider… He never meant to court all of us
If you replace one letter above, it will give new meaning to #DivideByZero.
Just replace “court” with “count” and you have a #ZeroDenom 😂
⬆️ >> #ZeroDenom Here is a humorous example that “proves” that 1 == 2.
Time to move up from elementary algebra :-)
"…any form of #BellsTheorem lets one quickly and easily prove that 0=1"
via @chemoelectric https://masto.ai/@chemoelectric/113856316516264216
This leads us to see one of the reasons John Clauser does not deserve his Nobel Prize: he did not arrive at the same result as QM, yet did not consider his result an error. ALL MATHEMATICAL METHODS MUST ARRIVE AT THE SAME RESULT. Otherwise mathematics would be inconsistent! And, indeed, any form of "Bell's theorem" lets one quickly and easily prove that 0=1.
>> #trump’s a divider… He never meant to court all of us
If you replace one letter above, it will give new meaning to #DivideByZero.
Just replace “court” with “count” and you have a #ZeroDenom 😂
It starts with the idea that “Americans” want something, when they mean only #conservatives, not majority of Americans.
That’s a #ZeroDenom
Then they use it to justify #Trump’s agenda and say President’s agenda is what really matters — nothing else. In other words, what “Americans” want is already out of the window — another #DivisionByZero.
Then the President’s “agenda” becomes a cult leader’s “desires” and who could question that!
Desires turn into “intent” —> naked power grab
I started noting the subtle but unmistakable creep in the #Project2025 rhetoric in this pinned thread ➡️ https://mastodon.social/@rameshgupta/112751032011681146
I stopped after a while because the #ZeroDenom pattern is visible early on — Inductive reasoning alone is enough to prove what utter garbage the whole document is, with no need to do an exhaustive read.
I’ve seen very high quality discussions on the lack of merits of proposals in Project 2025, but I’ve not seen a single one that tries to #NipItInTheBud.
Here is a humorous example that “proves” that 1 == 2.
I’m attaching a screenshot that captures the essence of the argument that seems quite logical, but the conclusion after the creep is garbage because a #divideByZero has already happened by the time you reach the final result.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbliihTJ4v4 [Turn off sound if you don’t speak #Hindi. The screens are all in English — no subtitles needed]