We are happy to announce that our 2026 Annual Event Bursary Applications are open! The deadline to apply is 13 April. For more details, how to apply and eligibility, please see our website: https://digitalhumanities-uk-ie.org/2026/03/23/2026-annual-event-bursary-announcement/

#digitalhumanities #digitalheritage #digitalscholarship #DH

2026 Annual Event: Paper Acceptances & Bursary Announcement | UK-Ireland Digital Humanities Association

Today is an Isidoct day : #zotero avancé et Introduction à la #scienceouverte sur la 2e journée avec les doctorants #SHS de #Lyon 😎
#phd #openscience #digitalscholarship #Isidoct

New publication:

Recursive Identity: Structural Conditions of Emergent Continuity – A Theoretical Monograph (Version 1.2)

A curated, revised, and extended international version of the original German Master of Record is now available.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18924601

#RecursiveIdentity #Identity #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #SystemTheory #Ontology #HybridArchitecture #ComputationalPhilosophy #MetaResearch #KnowledgeStructures #KnowledgeGraph #DigitalScholarship #OpenScience #Zenodo #DOI

Recursive Identity: Structural Conditions of Emergent Continuity – A Theoretical Monograph

This monograph presents a unified theoretical framework for understanding identity as a recursive informational process. It develops the concept of recursive identity as a dynamic, self‑referential architecture that generates continuity across temporal, contextual, and systemic transformations. Rather than treating identity as a property of a substrate, the framework analyzes the structural conditions under which identity‑bearing patterns emerge, stabilize, and evolve. The model identifies three foundational structural principles—Integration, Coherence, and Recursive Coupling—as the minimal and sufficient grammar for the persistence of identity. These principles explain how systems maintain continuity through fixed‑point dynamics, nonlinear feedback, and path‑dependent self‑organization, independent of any specific material realization. The framework thus provides a substrate‑neutral foundation for examining identity in complex systems, from cognitive and informational architectures to process‑philosophical and metatheoretical contexts. This record is linked to the accompanying Entry Note, which introduces the core intuition and conceptual posture of the framework. The Entry Note serves as an accessible companion document, offering a concise orientation to the structural logic of recursive identity and outlining the minimal conditions required for identity to arise as a process. Together, the monograph and the Entry Note provide a coherent theoretical basis for system‑theoretical, computational, and structural approaches to identity. The German Version 1.0 of the framework, published as Rekursive Identität: Eine Theorie struktureller Kontinuität (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18701758), serves as the master reference for the original formulation. This monograph is not a translation but a revised, extended, and carefully curated international version of the German Master of Record, offering a consolidated and further developed articulation of the framework.

Zenodo
[À noter] 24e C@fé Renatis – Click&Read : Comment optimiser l’accès à l’ensemble des documents de vos établissements cotutelles ?
🗓️24/03/26 13h30-14h30
🖊inscription => https://renatis.cnrs.fr/24e-cfe-renatis-clickread-comment-optimiser-lacces-a-lensemble-des-documents-de-vos-etablissements-cotutelles-24-03-2026/
#renatis #cafésRenatis #openscience #tools #digitalscholarship
#zotero update Changes in 8.0.4 (March 6, 2026) : des fix et un meilleur support de l'authentification à certains serveurs webdav
#digitalscholarship #bibliographictools #referencemanagement #researchassistant #opensource #openscience
Toward Hybrid Architectures: Functional AI and the Limits of Silicon Substrates: An ontological and dynamical framework for advanced artificial cognition

This research position paper develops an ontological and dynamical framework for understanding the limits of silicon‑based artificial intelligence and the material conditions required for genuine emergent cognition. Contemporary AI systems exhibit remarkable functional capabilities, yet their digital substrates lack the continuous, energetically grounded, and self‑organizing dynamics necessary for stabilizing inner states, multiscale feedback, and coherent internal trajectories. The paper argues that consciousness‑relevant emergence is a material phenomenon that cannot be simulated or instantiated within discrete computational architectures. It identifies the systemic thresholds—nonlinear coupling, metastability, energetic grounding, and multiscale integration—that biological systems satisfy and digital systems cannot. Building on these principles, the paper proposes hybrid cognitive architectures in which functional AI is coupled with dynamically rich substrates such as neuronal organoids, biohybrid systems, organic memristive materials, or other continuous, energy‑driven media. These substrates provide the physical conditions for coherence, continuity, and self‑organization, while silicon‑based components supply structure, task‑level organization, and symbolic processing. The work outlines the implications of this paradigm for AI research, cognitive science, ethics, and human–AI interaction. It clarifies the distinction between simulation and instantiation, addresses common counterarguments, and positions the model within existing theoretical frameworks without reducing it to any of them. The paper concludes by identifying the material and systemic thresholds required for true emergence in future hybrid human–AI systems. Authors's Note This paper is a structural argument rather than an empirical study. It synthesizes insights from systems theory, neuroscience, materials science, and philosophy of mind to clarify the material conditions under which consciousness can, in principle, arise. Its aim is not to predict specific technologies or make metaphysical claims, but to delineate the architectural boundaries that current digital systems cannot cross and to outline the substrate‑level requirements for future emergent cognition.

Zenodo
Nouveau billet du blog Zotero Francophone : "Zotero 8" 🔗 https://zotero.hypotheses.org/6234
(= traduction fr 🇫🇷🇨🇭🇨🇦🇱🇺 du billet d'annonce de la nouvelle version 8 de @zotero ! )
#outils #recherche #bibliographie #citations #humanitésnumériques #HN #digitalhumanities #digitalscholarship
Zotero 8

Ce billet est la traduction du billet du blog officiel de Zotero annonçant la publication de la version 8 de Zotero.

Le blog Zotero francophone
📢 Zotero 8 est désormais disponible !
✔️redesign de la fenêtre de citations
✔️annotations PDF sous les items
✔️thèmes pour le visualiseur
✔️notes en onglets
etc.
🔗 https://www.zotero.org/blog/zotero-8/
#zotero #citations #referencemanager #tools #digitalscholarship #writing #academictools #researchworkflow
Zotero Blog » Blog Archive » Zotero 8

Zotero is a free, easy-to-use tool to help you collect, organize, cite, and share research.

Unconscious incompetence with technology

I really like this concept I was introduced by Terry Hanley, writing about AI and psychotherapy:

When it comes to artificial intelligence and therapy, I’m increasingly struck by how many of us may be operating in a place of unconscious incompetence. Not through negligence or lack of care, but through familiarity. Therapy has always absorbed new tools, new forms of language, new contexts for relating. Technology, in that sense, can feel like just more background noise – something that sits “over there” in admin systems, appointment booking, outcome measures, or risk protocols.

But, and this is quite a big but, AI is arguably not just another tool. It is quietly reshaping how information is produced, filtered, summarised, and interpreted – including information about people’s distress, identities, and lives. And when something becomes woven into the fabric of everyday systems, it becomes easy not to notice what we don’t yet understand.

Unconscious incompetence is a surprisingly comfortable place to be. If we don’t quite see where AI is operating, or we assume it is neutral, peripheral, or someone else’s responsibility, then there is little immediate pressure to engage. The risk, however, is that decisions about therapeutic work – ethical, relational, and practical – are being shaped in ways we haven’t fully thought through.

https://counselling.substack.com/p/a-new-years-resolution-for-therapy?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=869300&post_id=183794185&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=hcf3&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

This is exactly how I’ve always seen the challenge of digital scholarship. What I call technological reflexivity is an antidote to unconscious incompetence in the sense of deliberately practicing a reflective orientation to the use of technology in your work. Competence can often result as an outcome of that process but it’s not a necessity for it – what matters is the reflection itself. This maps onto what Terry says here about therapists and AI:

None of this requires perfect knowledge. What it requires is attention, humility, and a willingness to say, “I need to know more about this and understand this better.” This list is of course not comprehensive but some areas that I believe are important for us to have on our radars.

The risk is not that we engage imperfectly, but that familiarity arrives before reflection. Seen this way, moving from unconscious incompetence to conscious competence is less about professional deficit and more about professional positioning. It shows up in small, often unremarkable practices: noticing where technologies are already shaping decisions, being clearer about boundaries in training and supervision, and staying alert to how administrative systems influence therapeutic work.

The phrase “familiarity arrives before reflection” feels like it concisely captures something I’ve been circling around for years without being able to quite express.

#AI #digitalScholarship #GenerativeAIForAcademics #psychotherapy #socialMediaForAcademics #sociotechnicalChange #technologicalReflexivity #TerryHanley #unconsciousCompetence

A New Year’s Resolution for Therapy: From Unconscious Incompetence to Conscious Competence with AI

The start of a new year often invites quiet stock-taking.

Counselling and Psychotherapy Stuff

Why I don’t like recording events

I was asked earlier why I don’t like recording events and realised I’d never actually written it down. There are a few reasons I feel increasingly strongly about this:

  • We have started to record academic events by default and I think that is fundamentally problematic in principle
  • There’s an assumption that the ease with which we can record online events means we should record them and I just don’t get why that is
  • There’s a fundamental value in the academic event as something that brings people together synchronously which recording undercuts
  • The biggest problem with online events is passive engagement and (automatic) recording of them fits into that structure
  • The quality of engagement should be more important than the quantity in most cases. What matters is how richly a core audience engages and there are trade offs which we need to recognise.
  • Recording undermines the space for intellectual improvisation and risk taking
  • The evidence I’ve seen (as someone who ran a lot of academic social media for a long time) is that engagement rates with event recording is very slow.
  • My hunch is that the request for a recording often tracks a fear of missing out as much as it does a deliberate intention to engage with the recording

I’m not saying never record events. Clearly this serves a purpose in some cases. But we should only record events when we are clear about the rationale for doing so.

#academicEvents #conferences #digitalScholarship #onlineVideo #publicScholarship #seminars #socialMediaForAcademics #workshops #zoom