LAWYERS UNEASY AS AI NOTE-TAKERS MINGLE IN MEETINGS

Lawyers worry about AI note-takers storing sensitive data outside the US, risking client confidentiality and legal privilege. What happens next?

#AINews, #LegalTech, #Confidentiality, #AttorneyClientPrivilege, #DataSecurity

https://newsletter.tf/ai-note-takers-lawyers-confidentiality-fears/

AI Note-Takers Raise Confidentiality Fears for Lawyers in 2026

Lawyers worry about AI note-takers storing sensitive data outside the US, risking client confidentiality and legal privilege. What happens next?

NewsletterTF

AI note-takers are raising concerns for lawyers. Many apps store data on third-party servers, potentially outside the US, which is a big worry for keeping client secrets safe.

#AINews, #LegalTech, #Confidentiality, #AttorneyClientPrivilege, #DataSecurity
https://newsletter.tf/ai-note-takers-lawyers-confidentiality-fears/

AI Note-Takers Raise Confidentiality Fears for Lawyers in 2026

Lawyers worry about AI note-takers storing sensitive data outside the US, risking client confidentiality and legal privilege. What happens next?

NewsletterTF

Caveat: #US #jurisdiction – but very interesting consequences for those believing they need an "#AI" to write texts for them:

»An #AI tool is not an attorney, and its terms of service may specifically disclaim any attorney-client relationship. Sharing case details with AI is legally equivalent to discussing them with a non-attorney friend.

Sending unprivileged AI-generated documents to your lawyer after the fact does not retroactively create privilege.«

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/your-ai-conversations-are-not-privileged-7029683/

#law #AttorneyClientPrivilege

Your AI Conversations Are Not Privileged | JD Supra

A New York Federal court just held that documents generated using an AI tool (Claude) and later shared with his attorneys are not protected by...

JD Supra

Mashable: AI-generated docs aren’t covered by attorney-client privilege, judge says. “AI is once again on the witness stand. In comments made during preliminary trial proceedings, Manhattan-based U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff decided that documents prepared by an AI tool and then shared with an attorney are admissible in court, existing outside of attorney-client privilege, reported […]

https://rbfirehose.com/2026/02/17/mashable-ai-generated-docs-arent-covered-by-attorney-client-privilege-judge-says/
Mashable: AI-generated docs aren’t covered by attorney-client privilege, judge says

Mashable: AI-generated docs aren’t covered by attorney-client privilege, judge says. “AI is once again on the witness stand. In comments made during preliminary trial proceedings, Manha…

ResearchBuzz: Firehose
DOJ argues conversations with Claude AI aren't legally privileged: Federal prosecutors claim defendant's Claude chatbot queries lack attorney-client privilege in securities fraud case, citing AI's non-attorney status and Anthropic's data policies. https://ppc.land/doj-argues-conversations-with-claude-ai-arent-legally-privileged/ #AI #Law #LegalTech #AttorneyClientPrivilege #SecuritiesFraud
DOJ argues conversations with Claude AI aren't legally privileged

Federal prosecutors claim defendant's Claude chatbot queries lack attorney-client privilege in securities fraud case, citing AI's non-attorney status and Anthropic's data policies.

PPC Land

Fitzpatrick also expressed particular concern that Halligan relied entirely on the testimony of a single FBI agent who may have reviewed material subject to Comey’s #AttorneyClientPrivilege with longtime assoc Daniel Richman, a Columbia law prof who also served as an ofcl adviser to the FBI dir. The FBI agent was made aware that he may have inadvertently reviewed the material improperly but still “proceeded into the grand jury undeterred & testified in support of the pending indictment.”

#law

#Boasberg asks #DOJ about his order to return the detainees to the US:

“You understood that?”

DOJ’s atty says that what he told the trump admin – is covered by #AttorneyClientPrivilege.

Judge Boasberg says that at the start of Sat’s hearing, the DOJ told him that it had "no detail" on the removal flights.

"No one told you anything about those flights?" Boasberg asked.

[btw, this was publicly available information via flight tracker]

🧵 #law #Constitution #immigration #DueProcess #Judiciary

US v #Trump (#ClassifiedDocuments)

New filing 1: re #AttorneyClientPrivilege #CrimeFraudException
“Piercing of the Attorney-Client Privilege”

New filing 2: re limited #GagOrder
“Modification of Conditions of Release”

#AileenCannon #criminal #law #NationalSecurity

And there it is, #Merchan signifies he’s losing patience w/ Bove as he continues to argue a decided issue. Bove insists it’s important, & generously Merchan gives him another chance to speak. But now Merchan repeats his previous decisions on the issue above is harping on, namely that #MichaelCohen was #Trump’s atty when the charged conduct took place.

[this should not be an issue in any court. It’s called #TheCrimeFraudException to
#AttorneyClientPrivilege.]

#law #TrumpTrial #JuryInstructions