7 Followers
82 Following
2.1K Posts

So I’ve been using Microsoft Stream at work to auto-caption videos. Part of my job is quality assurance so I double-check the captions for errors.

One recent annoyance is that the captioning software censors some words, replacing them with asterisks. One word in particular that has been a thorn in my side is the word “nipple”. I have had to work on several BREASTFEEDING videos. Needless to say, I’ve been retyping in the word “nipple” a lot.

Come to today, I’m working on a video about transgender and non-binary folks. The speaker said, “There is no such thing as straight sex and gay sex.” Lo and behold Microsoft in their infinite wisdom decided to censor the words “gay sex”. “Straight sex” is uncensored.

I’m fucking livid, but I have no real way to contact Microsoft on this. But, mark it down and spread the word, Microsoft are fucking homophobic prudes.

Drawing: Possible causes of your problems. I've been appalled at the scenes we've witnessed over the last few days. It's utterly unacceptable that people should have to live in fear because of the colour of their skin.
[Polite comments only, please.]

My political statment for the day: Toilet paper is free in schools and elsewhere, so tampons and sanitary napkins should be free.

Adding: I know, I'm a dangerously radical liberal.

and this goes for even the most heinous of words. if someone uses an incendiary racial slur, you better fucking believe that I want to know what they said so I can tell them to fuck off. DO. NOT. CENSOR. ACCESSIBILITY. TOOLS.
once again pissed off at censoring / sanitising language in subtitles. it's infantilising. I use subtitles all the time because of tinnitus and auditory processing issues, and I'll be damned if I want a bunch of handwringing prudish cunts fucking about with the language. censor ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in accessibility tools. I promise we're grown up enough to handle some swears and sex words, for shit's sake.
“Google conducted a quality degradation study, which showed that it would not lose search revenue if [it] were to significantly reduce the quality of its search product"... a company that can make its product worse “without concern of losing consumers, is proof of monopoly power” https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-the-google-search-monopoly-ruling-means/
What the Google Search Monopoly Ruling Means

An antitrust expert explains Monday’s landmark legal decision that Google illegally cemented its dominance in Internet search

Scientific American

James David Vance “is lying about the military service of a fellow veteran for political gain. The story is extremely simple, and extremely important — and it is a story about JD Vance being a liar.”

“What JD Vance is doing is as disgusting as politics gets. Privileging his lies, as @nytimes has done, is as disgusting as journalism gets.” https://www.findinggravity.net/p/breaking-the-new-york-times-helps

BREAKING: The New York Times helps JD Vance Swiftboat Tim Walz

Tell the news media not to privilege Republican lies about Tim Walz's military service

Finding Gravity
Yes.
"For our communities to be safe from fascism, our streets must be unsafe for fascists"
Spotted on a Bristol street sign, in advance of a planned far-right protest.
Pete Buttigieg (@PeteButtigieg) on X

Come to think of it, denigrating the worth of a soldier’s service based on whether he deployed to a war zone is… kind of like denigrating the worth of a woman’s citizenship based on whether she happens to have children.

X (formerly Twitter)