Zack Batist

@zackbatist@archaeo.social
453 Followers
412 Following
1,043 Posts

Postdoc at McGill. I research collaborative research practices and the uptake of new tools that reconfigure knowledge production, especially in archaeology and the social sciences and humanities, and now also in epidemiology.

Specifically: data sharing, open source communities of practice, and the cultural and epistemic implications of open science infrastructures and policy.

Also interested in bad sci-fi, experimental and DIY tech stuff and point-and-click video games :)

Webhttps://zackbatist.info
Bloghttps://blog.zackbatist.info
GitHubhttps://github.com/zackbatist
CatsEllie & Bob
ellie
how i feel sometimes
My mom is reading a Jodi Picoult novel about romance among archaeologists (honestly, not far off from https://twitter.com/tinyarchae), and she sent me some really great descriptions of digital fieldwork methods
tinyarchae (@tinyarchae) on X

follow tiny archaeologists on a tiny excavation

X (formerly Twitter)
some of the books I read in 2024 (I gave several others to friends too)
Some fruit is finally growing from my 6 foot tomato plant
ArcheoFOSS XVII – Zack's Blog

Lovely day
Day two of #archeoFOSS begins now, with a panel on the roadmap to cooperation and transparency: fostering open science solutions in archaeology #OpenScience #OpenArchaeology

My dissertation is now available online! Please check it out to see what I've been up to over the past 7 years.

Archaeological data work as continuous and collaborative practice: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8373390

Archaeological data work as continuous and collaborative practice

This dissertation critically examines the sociotechnical structures that archaeologists rely on to coordinate their research and manage their data. I frame data as discursive media that communicate archaeological encounters, which enable archaeologists to form productive collaboration relationships. All archaeological activities involve data work, as archaeologists simultaneously account for the decisions and circumstances that framed the information they rely on to perform their own practices, while anticipating how their information outputs will be used by others in the future. All archaeological activities are therefore loci of practical epistemic convergence, where meanings are negotiated in relation to communally-held objectives. Through observations of and interviews with archaeologists at work, and analysis of the documents they produce, I articulate how data sharing relates distributed work experiences as part of a continuum of practice. I highlight the assumptions and value regimes that underlie the social and technical structures that support productive archaeological work, and draw attention to the inseparable relationship between the management of labour and data. I also relate this discursive view of data sharing to the open data movement, and suggest that it is necessary to develop new collaborative commitments pertaining to data publication and reuse that are more in line with disciplinary norms, expectations, and value regimes.

Zenodo