Yoïn van Spijk

3.6K Followers
156 Following
3.5K Posts

DJO-in ['dʑowɪn]

Historisch taalkundige, schrijver van 'Die goeie ouwe taal' en 'Woord voor woord, en vaste auteur bij Onze Taal

Historical linguist, writer

photo: Dirk-Jan van Dijk

Linktreehttps://www.linktr.ee/yvanspijk
All my infographics on Tumblrhttps://www.tumblr.com/yvanspijk
Support me on Patreonhttps://www.patreon.com/yvanspijk

@elnecesario That's indeed a coincidence. In 'each', the <ch> spelling represents a different sound, and it arose in a different way. In German, West Germanic *aik became 'Eiche' because single k became the Ich/Ach-laut regardless of neighbouring sounds, while in English, k only bechame the ch sound of 'cheese' if it was followed or preceded by an i: *aiki > *each.
Compare 'milk', 'to make', 'book' with 'Milch', 'machen', 'Buch'.

(Of course, 'oak' and 'Eiche' do have the same ancestor: *aik.)

@allypally That's really cool!
@skua Ah, I see! 😊
@skua I'm afraid I don't understand. 😊

The geat were eating nit under the each.

‘Geat’, ‘nit’, ‘each’– this is what the original plural forms of ‘goat’, ‘nut’, and ‘oak’ would’ve looked like if they hadn’t been replaced by ‘goats’, ‘nuts’, and ‘oaks’.

How did plurals with a vowel alternation came to be, such as ‘man ~ men’ and ‘mouse ~ mice’?

What would the lost ones have sounded like if they’d been preserved?

My short video will tell you:
https://youtube.com/shorts/CTjYP8skREc

58: One goat, two geat

YouTube
@wahoonie Because its West Germanic ancestor didn't end in -i.

2/

If you’d like to learn all about this phenomenon – which extends way beyond plurals but has got nothing to do with vowel alternations in verbs, such as ‘ride ~ rode ~ ridden’ – I highly recommend Danny Bate’s article:
https://dannybate.com/2022/03/17/of-mouses-and-mans-the-origins-of-englishs-vowel-swapping-nouns-and-verbs/

Of Mouses and Mans? — The Origins of English’s Vowel-Swapping Nouns and Verbs

Introduction: Nouns, Verbs and Variable Vowels In present-day English, the plural of mouse is usually mice, and one man plus another equals two men. While most English nouns are made plural simply …

Danny L. Bate

The geat were eating nit under the each.

‘Geat’, ‘nit’, ‘each’– this is what the original plural forms of ‘goat’, ‘nut’, and ‘oak’ would’ve looked like if they hadn’t been replaced by ‘goats’, ‘nuts’, and ‘oaks’.

How did plurals with a vowel alternation came to be, such as ‘man ~ men’ and ‘mouse ~ mice’?

What would the lost ones have sounded like if they’d been preserved?

My short video will tell you:
https://youtube.com/shorts/CTjYP8skREc

58: One goat, two geat

YouTube

Waarom heeft 'zoeken' de vreemde verleden tijd 'zocht'?

Je ontdekt het in mijn nieuwe artikel - met uitstapjes naar het Engels, Duits, Brabants, Limburgs en Nedersaksisch.

Tussendoor kun je luisteren naar de gereconstrueerde uitspraak van historische woorden.

https://taalaandewandel.com/2026/03/29/zoeken-zocht-to-search/

Zoeken, zocht & to search

Ons woord zoeken is familie van het Engelse to seek. Mensen vragen mij weleens of die twee dan ook verwant zijn aan to search, maar dat is niet het geval: etymologisch hebben ze niets met elkaar te…

Taal aan de wandel
Spreek jij Twents, Sallands of een andere Overijsselse streektaal en wil je helpen om een Nedersaksische spraaktechnologie te ontwikkelen? Doneer dan vanaf 31 maart jouw stem aan dit bijzondere project van de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Meer weten? Kijk op: https://praoten.nl/nl