| pronouns | they/them |
| genre | cosmic |
| existence | dreadful |
| pronouns | they/them |
| genre | cosmic |
| existence | dreadful |
the TLDR again is that Hoover wrote this book to feel like a romance and make all of the main couple's moments romantic but the relationship is violently abusive, and it's popular among teens and young adults.
a coloring book so you can relive the highlights of a book that's intentionally rose-colored abuse, knowing it'll get snatched up by teens and young adults? problematic af
Here is my thread on Colleen Hoover and more context on why this is a bad idea: https://queer.garden/@winterdemon/109563475560104292
individual toots have CWs but overall, there's talk of how Hoover intentionally manipulates readers into romanticizing an abusive relationship, as well as references to intimate partner violence/domestic abuse, incest, and a gross way of talking about a child
for those who don't know, colleen hoover is a popular american contemporary author who writes "romance" novels, promoted incessantly on tiktok to the point where she's become a bestseller many times over. she doesn't believe in content warnings and has been criticized for how her books shirk genre conventions to intentionally blindside readers.
Colleen Hoover's book about domestic violence written through a rose-colored lens is getting a coloring book.
"Now you can color illustrations of the most memorable scenes"
.......he beats her repeatedly. what is there to color but the fear in her eyes and the blood on her face, wtf??????
i've heard so many thoughtful critiques of her work that i understand i won't like it, but also i like having firsthand experience of things i don't like but also,,,,,
so bland i don't know if i could actually make it to the end