'In dark times, should the stars also go out?'
queer anarchist // jewish anti-zionist
I'm still COVIDing and you should too
| pronouns | she/her |
| discord | same as here |
| more info in | my pinned intro post |
@doogie2k.northsky.social
well,, firstly: hell yeah, finally
otoh, you really need to keep backups doogs!
to explain a bit more why I added the note at the bottom:
It's easy enough to find confirmation that TELUS itself was breached from TELUS themselves
and that CR made use of TELUS
in terms of hard evidence about the details of what could have leaked from CR specifically, reports I'm seeing seem to largely source back to the same couple of places that state they did the footwork to prove it but didn't present that evidence directly, beyond making the connection to TELUS I mentioned above
PSA: It seems Crunchyroll was breached, according to reporting from multiple other websites so far
at the least, you're probably going to want to lock or replace any credit cards you had associated with it
while passwords aren't listed in the stolen info, it would be a good idea to change that too (and do the same anywhere else you potentially use that same password)
to be clear, CR has not yet confirmed it themselves, but I figure an abundance of caution is worthwhile here
RE: https://digipres.club/@foone/116241346584343156
since starting this, I've gotten sued by a credit card company for being unable to pay, and had to pay 700$ due to a delivery fuckup.
Please, if you can donate, it'd really help.
I suspect LLMs reinforce the Gell-Mann amnesia effect. Experts who query LLMs about their fields of expertise will *quickly* realize how wrong their output can be, how quick they are to confabulate, and how eager they are to confirm oneās biases. Sometimes, replying āNo, thatās wrong, try againā can cause an LLM to generate a completely differentāand often oppositeāanswer to the same query, which makes no sense if the LLM had *actually* worked out an independently coherent answer.
Asking an LLM to comment about a subject you know nothing aboutāor worse, know a little bit aboutāis a psychologically dangerous activity. Not only will it confirm your biases, it will do so in a way that *appears* to be objective and independent, using fallacies that lie just beyond your ability to discern. At best, you will be misled. At worst, you will begin spiraling down a path of conspiracy thinking.
Be extremely suspicious of answers that are especially satisfying; you might have just gaslit yourself.
Souvlaki Space Station šø
šø
Alice Averlongš³ļøāā§ļø
Dave Rahardja