@coldfish @j2bryson Transparent disclosure of any kind of AI-assistance shouldn't be a controversial topic for anyone who's choosing to use it. The possibility of your clients distrusting you about the extent of the AI-assistance in your work arises precisely because there's a lack of transparency about it in the first place. And if your clients have an issue with you using genAI in your work in general - well, I suppose you change your target audience then. Because consumers have a right to know. And there are plenty of reasons besides accuracy or security for why someone would choose to opt out of it. Maybe they'd rather not contribute to the climate impact of it or to the abuse of people in the Global South in order to drive the AI-adoption forward. Similarly to how vegetarians choose to not consume meat. That doesn't give manufacturers freedom to not mention that there's meat in their products. I suppose you can see how that would be unacceptable.

@kroitus ir aš norėčiau prisidėti! Jei dar ne per vėlu for RSVP :)

@lcamtuf bet you still can resist a book while visiting Europe (France)... it just hits different there!

@kazkassukompais į diegtuves mielai būčiau atvykus ir paklausius ankstesniojo įrašo bandžiau pas jus čia paieškoti apie renginį info, bet nieko neradau, tai galvojau, kad ne taip ką supratau. Kitais soc tinklais nesinaudoju, tai ribotos ir ieškos galimybės. Jei kada dar organizuosit, pasidalinkit ir čia, ateisiu savo lyties paatstovaut :)