hey peeps, are you still using mastodon? i've been away for a while

@vlentz yes. when defining them, insiat that they're SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-bound).

@mikebrew i attended scrum.org's PSK training and read a lot of material. i've described my prep workflow here https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/psk-i-exam-really-hard-luka-mati%C4%87/ and you can find my reading list and annotations here https://hypothes.is/users/skribomatic?q=tag%3APSK

@[email protected] @thatagile nothing happened. ways are methods. scrum doesn't prescribe methods – it does prescribe feedback loops, accountabilities, artifacts and commitments.
and I'm totally fine with people experimenting with frameworks, just don't call it scrum if it gets rid of any of the minimal requirements of that specific framework

@[email protected] @thatagile yup, i understood that but i still disagree :) namely – speaking of the mechanical application of scrum – it has a name, #zombiescrum and strategies how to overcome it. but, with regards to scrum, i align with the professional scrum and agree that you can't call it scrum if you don't do it as it should be done. that's why the framework is lightweight and doesn't prescribe methods of work, just the frame and feedback loops.