935 Followers
628 Following
10.2K Posts

I make music when I can. I own too many synthesizers. I program C++ for money, but it's usually reasonably fun.

he/him or they/them, as you prefer.

#nobot

My music on Bandcamphttps://arcseconds.bandcamp.com/
Discographyhttps://arcseconds.net
Photographyhttps://visible.pictures/
Gabe Newell Is Shitting Yacht Money into Flatpak and You're Still Arguing about Init Systems https://lobste.rs/s/miurfk #linux #rant
https://s3kshun8.games/blog/flatpak-won/
Gabe Newell Is Shitting Yacht Money into Flatpak and You're Still Arguing about Init Systems

0 comments

Lobsters

RE: https://cosocial.ca/@timbray/116273912951090941

OK, brace yourself. What’s better than Sam Ruby’s “Rails on JavaScript”?

Well obviously, it’s Sam’s “Rails on JavaScript on Phoenix on Elixir on Erlang”!

https://intertwingly.net/blog/2026/04/02/Rails-on-the-BEAM.html

Obvious, right? Ignore that shrill buzz, it’s the sound of my head spinning.

#erlang #rails

Today at the playground a five year old corrected my German grammar.
niki grayson (@nikigrayson.com)

right now the astronauts are calling houston because the computer on the spaceship is running two instances of microsoft outlook and they can't figure out why. nasa is about to remote into the computer

Bluesky Social

Did artists who made one-hit-wonders know that there was something special about their song before release? Many artists work in a flow state and attribute their art to God or some higher power because it seems to flow through them beyond their own understanding.

Did the guys who recorded Macarena wake up the next day, hit play on the tape recorder and just sit there like "holy shit. Oh my God. Oh my God."

My phone is as powerful as like thousands of Apollo computers that brought astronauts to the moon but I can't set more than one egg timer at a time because of something called User Experience.

I think something that's worth highlighting is that both communities are concerned with empowerment and disempowerment. And I tend to think these tools tend to *appear* empowering, but are actually disempowering, in their current configuration.

I don't believe LLMs are fundamentally disempowering, and could be part of an empowering future, but the present *industrial deployment* of AI tech within our *socio-economic environment* is net-disempowering. And I worry that there is a big rush to adopt with so little settled about the legal implications on the one side, and with *well known* problems for AI generated code on the other.

Not all AI coding usage is necessarily doomed to be a problem: using local models to "lint" or discover vulnerabilities/bugs is actually probably very good, in the way that having fuzzers is good. But there is so much pressure to adopt beyond the space of what's good and to dismiss real concerns that I am worried it is going to take a long time to undo damage

Since I haven't posted it in a few years... Behold! The greatest video art piece ever made: Björn Melhus' No Sunshine (1997).

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X-4_BVLnAgw

Bjorn Melhus - No Sunshine 1997.flv

YouTube
⟨ᔌ⟩

In order to make coding LLMs work better, it's often helpful to provide more information about the code being worked on. As LLMs work entirely based on the human languages they were trained in, the best thing to do is to provide plain English text about the code.

Ultimately the software industry has invented the most fucked up method to force software engineers to document their code. All this text intended for LLMs is often useful to humans, too.