@javbw @kevinrothrock Yes, of course, the fewer the better. Zero is a nice number. What I was trying to say is that getting more doesn't really change your policy options or those of your opponents
@larthallor Then the question is what is the minimum second strike capability and in what ways it matters. People tend to think about these things in terms of "throw-weight advantage after a third strike", which is very wrong.
@larthallor I'd say the question here is why people believe that numbers do matter. Do you have a good answer to that?
Just a thought about arms control. Why does it matter if China has 1500 nuclear warheads (and not 400+)? Or that the US has 3500 (and not 1550)? Russia has 2000 non-strategic warheads or 20? Nothing good, of course, but it's not really important. Numbers don't matter.
@Supercola It's in the next sentence
There are many reasons a statement like this would be extremely unhelpful. For one, an accident at NPP and nuclear use are very different events, physically and politically. If concerns about a provocation are legitimate, there are better ways to prevent it. It is important to make it clear that very much the only way a significant radiological event can happen at ZNPP is if it is deliberately created from the inside
My Twitter to Mastodon post doesn't seem to be working. But I will try to either post things here or duplicate my Twitter posts manually.
RT @[email protected]
Empire and colonies: an introduction
1. Russia imposes Communism in Czechia
2. Making it difficult to impossible to function without paying lip service to the Communist shibboleths
3. Now Russians are criticising Czechs for having paid the lip service to the said shibboleths https://twitter.com/russianforces/status/1619767757360492545
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/kamilkazani/status/1620083362491936770
Pavel Podvig on Twitter
“Petr Pavel is the embodiment of conformism - from the communist party to NATO HQ - and yet he feels he can lecture Navalny about nationalism. Pathetic.”
Twitter