I own a pickup truck and a drill press. I have a right to own them, I think.

There's nothing in the Constitution about pickup trucks or drill presses.

I also own a rifle.

Nobody wants to take away my drill press or my rifle.

I just don't think a pickup truck, a drill press, or a rifle require a Constitutional Amendment.

The truck requires me to periodically demonstrate my ability to be a responsible owner/driver and that seems very reasonable. A rifle should require something similar and even more stringent and yet it doesn't.

The Constitutional Amendment relaxes the requirement for responsibility for firearm ownership. That's just wrong.

The main argument I hear for retaining the gun ownership Constitutional Amendment is that firearms are needed to combat government tyranny.

And yet here we are daily witnessing the single most obvious tyrannical activity: masked, unbadged, armed men are attacking civilians in American cities.

Where are the men with Constitutionally protected firearms? Why are they not fighting tyranny with their rifles?