Peter Fallesen

260 Followers
218 Following
81 Posts
PhD. Research professor. #Demography, #sociology, and family #economics. I study some good and a lot of bad stuff in families. Based in Florence
Websitewww.peterfallesen.com

New paper hot of the presses in PDR with
@MarcoCozzani,
@JuhoHarkonen,
@PassarettaG, and @FabrizioBernardi "The Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic for Fertility and Birth Outcomes: Evidence from Spanish Birth Registers".

https://t.co/w4V98PNUqN

RT @[email protected]

Great session on data visualisation at this week's @[email protected] methods meetup; here are some #dataviz resources we found that social scientists might find helpful

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/markfransham/status/1620419574821982212

Mark Fransham on Twitter

“Great session on data visualisation at this week's @DSPI_Oxford methods meetup; here are some #dataviz resources we found that social scientists might find helpful”

Twitter

RT @[email protected]

OH på redaktionen: Irmas lukning bliver Østerbros Ungdomshuset #dkmedier

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/BertilFruelund/status/1620368429072125953

Bertil Fruelund on Twitter

“OH på redaktionen: Irmas lukning bliver Østerbros Ungdomshuset #dkmedier”

Twitter

RT @[email protected]

Did you use Clarify for Stata but would like to do it in R? Or maybe you used {Zelig} for R (before it retired)? Welcome to our new R package {clarify}: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results https://www.iq.harvard.edu/news/dss-new-r-package-clarify

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/kinggary/status/1620155049904324608

New R Package {clarify}: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results

Data Science Services at IQSS has released a new R package {clarify} to provide functionality previously provided by the {Zelig} package

RT @[email protected]

I dagens @[email protected] kommenterer jeg på retssikkerhed, retsfølelse og politiets efterforskningsarbejde og hvordan det nu lige er det står til med varetægtsfængsling i Danmark. https://www.information.dk/debat/2023/01/varetaegtsfaengsling-skader-arbejds-familieliv-uanset-skyld-systemet-kan-indrettes-bedre?lst_frnt

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/L_H_Andersen/status/1620065532274962435

Varetægtsfængsling skader arbejds- og familieliv uanset skyld. Systemet kan indrettes bedre

Danmark får jævnligt kritik af FN’s Torturkomité for brugen af varetægtsfængsling. Uanset skyld har varetægtsfængsling store negative konsekvenser, og derfor er der behov for, at vi ser på, hvordan vi kan indrette systemet bedre.

Dagbladet Information

RT @[email protected]

⏰ One week left to apply ⏰
I can't wait to get started on this project - come work with me and the rest of a great group! https://twitter.com/kikarstoft/status/1598239870350082049

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/kikarstoft/status/1619968405569929219

Karen-Inge Karstoft on Twitter

“🥁 POST DOC POSITION IN WONDERFUL COPENHAGEN 🥁 I'm looking for a post doc for our project on adverse childhood experiences and high-risk employment. If you're into lots of data, nice people, public health/psychology/epidemiology, this might be for you: https://t.co/cS7W0RfKl5”

Twitter

Did I mention that I have a new paper out w great folks (Marcelo Cardona, @pfallesen, and Tim Bruckner)? Just published in BMC Public Health, on the risk of stress/depression during the pandemic in Denmark: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-023-15129-5.

For the study behind the paper, we collected and used 10 nationally representative survey rounds (some panel, some repeat cross sections) from just before first lockdown to April 2022.

Key findings:

Stress/depression across the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark - BMC Public Health

Background Global estimates suggest strained mental health during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the lack of nationally representative and longitudinal data with clinically validated measures limits knowledge longer into the pandemic. Methods Data from 10 rounds of nationally representative surveys from Denmark tracked trends in risk of stress/depression from just before the first lockdown and through to April 2022. We focused on age groups and men and women in different living arrangements and controlled for seasonality in mental health that could otherwise be spuriously related to pandemic intensity. Results Prior to first lockdown, we observed a “parent gap”, which closed with the first lockdown. Instead, a gender gap materialized, with women experiencing higher risks than men—and higher than levels predating first lockdown. Older respondents (+ 70 years) experienced increasing risks of stress/depression early in the pandemic, while all other groups experienced decreases. But longer into the pandemic, risks increased for all age groups and reached (and sometimes exceeded) levels from before first lockdown. Conclusion Denmark had low infection rates throughout most of the pandemic, low mortality rates across the entire pandemic, and offered financial aid packages to curb financial strains. Despite this circumstance, initial improvements to mental health during the first lockdown in Denmark were short-lived. Two years of pandemic societal restrictions correspond with deteriorating mental health, as well as a change from a parenthood gap in mental health before first lockdown to a gender gap two years into the pandemic.

BioMed Central
Bank of Italy - Gender Economics Workshop

The Bank of Italy is organising a Gender Economics Workshop on the 23rd of June, 2023. The workshop aims at providing researchers in the field of gender economics an opportunity to present their work and to contribute to the debate about gender gaps in ...

RT @[email protected]

🚨New Publication🚨
@[email protected] , @[email protected] , T. Bruckner and I used 10 rounds of survey data from just before the first lockdown in Denmark 🇩🇰through April 2022 to study the development in the risk of stress/depression in Denmark
https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-023-15129-5
1/4🧵

🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/mcardona87/status/1618536526136344576

Stress/depression across the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark - BMC Public Health

Background Global estimates suggest strained mental health during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the lack of nationally representative and longitudinal data with clinically validated measures limits knowledge longer into the pandemic. Methods Data from 10 rounds of nationally representative surveys from Denmark tracked trends in risk of stress/depression from just before the first lockdown and through to April 2022. We focused on age groups and men and women in different living arrangements and controlled for seasonality in mental health that could otherwise be spuriously related to pandemic intensity. Results Prior to first lockdown, we observed a “parent gap”, which closed with the first lockdown. Instead, a gender gap materialized, with women experiencing higher risks than men—and higher than levels predating first lockdown. Older respondents (+ 70 years) experienced increasing risks of stress/depression early in the pandemic, while all other groups experienced decreases. But longer into the pandemic, risks increased for all age groups and reached (and sometimes exceeded) levels from before first lockdown. Conclusion Denmark had low infection rates throughout most of the pandemic, low mortality rates across the entire pandemic, and offered financial aid packages to curb financial strains. Despite this circumstance, initial improvements to mental health during the first lockdown in Denmark were short-lived. Two years of pandemic societal restrictions correspond with deteriorating mental health, as well as a change from a parenthood gap in mental health before first lockdown to a gender gap two years into the pandemic.

BioMed Central
Paper available at @[email protected] and study funded by Riksbankens Jubileumsfond and @[email protected] n/n