@pancsta

7 Followers
11 Following
153 Posts

"For the last decade, fast-to-ship beat fast-to-run. Not anymore. [...] AI got good at the hard languages." by Noah Mitchem

https://medium.com/@NMitchem/if-ai-writes-your-code-why-use-python-bf8c4ba1a055

#python #rustlang #golang #artificialintelligence #codingagents

If AI Writes Your Code, Why Use Python?

For the last decade, fast-to-ship beat fast-to-run. Not anymore.

Medium
The GoLand 2026.2 Early Access Program Has Started | The GoLand Blog

The Early Access Program (EAP) for GoLand 2026.2 is now open. It’s a great opportunity to try upcoming features for free and help shape the product. EAP builds give you early access to what we’re w

The JetBrains Blog
Release v0.18.9 · pancsta/asyncmachine-go

The highlight of this release is AI support. Changelog be86950 feat(am-dbg): add --output-call-log for statically typed handler log (#418) 7081823 feat(am-dbg): add MCP server and REPL (#414) d40...

GitHub

Someone is vibe-porting TypeScript compiler to Rust, it is already faster than Go version. https://tsz.dev/

#Rust #Go #Typescript

tsz - A TypeScript compiler in Rust.

A TypeScript compiler in Rust.

tsz
Yggdrasil Network as an Embedded Go Library

0 comments

Lobsters

RE: https://mastodon.social/@lobsters/116539097935458817

Good job, Simpson! Although that's more cursing... than I like to hear from a cadet in peacetime.

#go #GoLang #opinion

Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device https://www.thatprivacyguy.com/blog/chrome-silent-nano-install/

> No consent dialog. No opt-out UI. Re-installs itself if the user removes it manually.

That is the true definition of malware.

Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent. At a billion-device scale the climate costs are insane. — That Privacy Guy!

Google Chrome is downloading a 4 GB Gemini Nano model onto users' machines without consent, with no opt-in, no opt-out short of enterprise tooling, and an automatic re-download every time the user deletes it. The pattern is identical to the Anthropic Claude Desktop case I wrote about last month, but the scale is between two and three orders of magnitude larger. This article does the legal analysis and, for the first time, the environmental analysis. The numbers are not small.

That Privacy Guy!

New Research: Malicious Ruby gems and Go modules impersonated developer tools to steal secrets and poison CI.

Socket researchers found credential theft, GitHub Actions tampering, fake Go wrappers, proxy manipulation, and SSH persistence.

https://socket.dev/blog/malicious-ruby-gems-and-go-modules-steal-secrets-poison-ci #golang

Malicious Ruby Gems and Go Modules Impersonate Developer Tools to Steal Secrets and Poison CI

GitHub account BufferZoneCorp published sleeper packages that later added credential theft, GitHub Actions tampering, fake go wrappers, and SSH persistence.

Socket

This Guardian article https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/apr/29/claude-ai-deletes-firm-database suffers from the same trap of anthropomorphism as the original I read: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116482496017786464

agent gone rogue

These tools have no concept of what a job is. They don't go rogue, they produce plausible text. Now complete idiots have wired them to command lines (the old school but still powerful way for humans to interact with computers) and APIs (programmatic mechanisms for interacting with a computer) and they produce plausible interactions. Some of which involve deleting databases.

The culprit was Cursor, an AI agent 

The culprit was the idiot who wired the agent into their production system.

[Jeremy Crane posted on X how] the AI coding agent caused his business to unravel.

Jeremy Crane caused his own business to unravel.

The agent appeared to plead guilty in its own response

At last, an "appeared to". These tools are all appearance and no substance.

Crane’s takeaway was that “the agent didn’t just fail safety. It explained, in writing, exactly which safety rules it ignored.”

Wrong takeaway, my friend. The takeaway is that it generated more plausible text in response to your misguided attempt to discover its 'reasoning'. There is no reasoning. Just plausible text. The correct takeaway is that you should be charged in a court of law for negligence and wilful incompetence by the board of your company, and immediately fired.

And of course there's not a word in the article about any of the core problems I raise. Because journalists are just as bamboozled by this technology as the poor saps who implement agents in their business, thanks to the lying and deceit of the AI boosters.

#FuckAI #LlmAgents

Claude-powered AI agent’s confession after deleting a firm’s entire database: ‘I violated every principle I was given’

A startup was left scrambling after a rogue AI agent deleted swaths of code underpinning its business

The Guardian
#Claude Code (Opus 4.7, 1M context) is capable of reverse-engineering binaries. I just tried it on a moderately big #Go binary with debug info removed (`-ldflags="-s -w" -trimpath`) and it explained quite well what the program does. It used `nm`, `otool`, `strings` etc. It couldn't decompile it though