This article strikes at the heart of the weirdness in the software industry right now. Programmers making $200K+ are no longer writing code but instead simply supervising Claude Code which writes the code for them.
But instead of being afraid for their jobs, they are excited by how much more productive they are.
Seems painfully obvious that, whatever you think about #genai code, anyone using it is heading for a code-review logjam. Assuming that the org requires code review; if yours doesn’t, nothing I can say will help you. Anyhow, Rishi Baldawa writes smart stuff about the problem and possible ways forward, in ˚The Reviewer Isn't the Bottleneck”: https://rishi.baldawa.com/posts/review-isnt-the-bottleneck/
[My prediction: A lot of orgs will *not* do smart things about this and will suffer disastrous consequences in the near future.]

AI tools are flooding PR queues and the instinct everywhere is to call review the bottleneck. I think that’s the wrong question. The reviewer is the last sync point before production changes. The goal shouldn’t be how to remove the gate, but how to make it cheaper to operate.
RE: https://mas.to/@carnage4life/116193223287360056
I can relate to this. Using Claude Code brings out the same feelings I got as a kid when I was first learning to code. That feeling was why I got into this career path in the first place.