@paco Fair point. I have admittedly zero hands-on Xen experience, which could very well be *the* deciding factor.
As an aside, I think some people have strong opinions about how Proxmox handles HA by-comparison.
@paco SATA or SAS drives? If the latter, that's a pretty resilient and performant local storage solution, and not 'immature' at all. I might be more worried about disaster recovery depending on how that looks.
I also think the point @unixorn makes about distinguising between storage location of virtual system disks versus non-system disks is important.
Next questions would be about what kind of non-system disk data specifically, you think you could be storing more effectively and why. Not to mention thorough benchmarking of current local storage to even coherently compare to non-local options. Otherwise a storage network for the sake of a storage network is just that.
@codinghorror 100% legitimate call-out, and I was never challenging that point. Merely that 'pick poison or off-grid' is a false dichotomy. Not all technology is metaphorical poison—and 'off-grid' has its own technology needs in almost-2026.
I mean shit, I've spent the last decade trying to settle on Proxmox or bhyve while the now-outdated hardware gathers dust (that it can't even serve everything I currently rely on other people's servers for notwithstanding). Not sure if 'de-clouding' is even a reasonable pursuit anymore.