8 Followers
113 Following
27 Posts

@nicholas

Here are some things to consider:

1. Everything is cleaner than coal, see chart in article below.
2. Everything is safer than coal, see chart in article below.
3. Gas is much better than coal on both counts, see chart in article below.
4. Electricity supply can be smoothed with variable pricing.
5. Electricity supply can be smoothed with non-battery storage such as off-river pumped hydro, sand gravity storage, thermal storage.
6. Electricity supply can be smoothed with grid improvements, locally and with interconnects.
7. Electricity demand can be cut with district heating e.g. from industrial and geothermal sources.
8. Electricity demand from FF can be cut with a carbon tax.

Literally everything is better than continued use of coal for base load electricity demand for decades as in that projection.

https://ourworldindata.org/safest-sources-of-energy

What are the safest and cleanest sources of energy?

Fossil fuels are the dirtiest and most dangerous energy sources, while nuclear and modern renewable energy sources are vastly safer and cleaner.

Our World in Data

GOOD

#HarveyWeinstein faces New York retrial after 2020 rape conviction overturned

Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, says his team is determined to retry case against the disgraced movie mogul #legal
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/may/01/harvey-weinstein-overturned-trial?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Harvey Weinstein faces New York retrial after 2020 rape conviction overturned

Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, says his team is determined to retry case against the disgraced movie mogul

The Guardian
Flexible Levitation on a Track (FLOAT) - NASA

We propose developing FLOAT -- Flexible Levitation on a Track -- to meet these transportation needs.

NASA
What should I call this big sleepy guy? He already has a name, I just need urgent help coming up with an 86th nickname for Fishy. I'm sure all the other cat people on here understand.
They call me a sexual tornado because if you see me you should avoid windows and hide in the bathtub.
Laser propulsion - Wikipedia

@nicholas I think this is an interesting idea. What I am wondering is what the energetic costs of getting the things up there (and maintaining them there) are in relation to return on energy costs? (EROI). Is there anything that weighs this up in simple terms? And what about security? Politically it might be a hard sell if a big chunk of national energy is sitting up there looking vulnerable to bad actors ...

https://www.space.com/spacex-starship-solar-power-beaming-virtus-solis

"...will make orbiting power plants not only affordable, but cheaper than many other methods of generating electricity on Earth..."

#space based #solar and #nuclear are the best routes to a #postscarcity #economy because terrestrial #renewables are too intermittent and just don't produce enough #baseload energy.

#duckcurve #GreenEnergy #decarbonization #ClimateChange

SpaceX's Starship could help this start-up beam clean energy from space. Here's how (video)

"Once Starship is fully reusable, that will drive down the cost."

Space

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2024/04/22/california-solar-duck-curve-rooftop/

Holy fuck.

"In recent years in California, the duck curve has become a massive, deep canyon — and solar power is going unused."

Ya don't say. Still, #BuryTheLede tho. Headline incongruent.

#wapo #greenenergy #decarbonization #climatechange

#solarpower #solar

#duckcurve

Headline makes it sound like energy prices are negative. BS.

Rooftop solar panels are flooding California’s grid. That’s a problem.

As electricity prices go negative, the Golden State is struggling to offload a glut of solar power.

The Washington Post