RE: https://mastodon.social/@romeu/116273189510455252
see also: “do not hallucinate”
👾 chaotic good
brooklyn-based designer, programmer, and dabbler in music, art, and other random endeavors.
🇵🇸 free Palestine
| personal site | https://mauriciogiraldo.com |
RE: https://mastodon.social/@romeu/116273189510455252
see also: “do not hallucinate”
Tangentially, I'm also tired of the whole "The fascists have taken the wrong lesson from dystopian fiction!" people. For the love of all of our mental healths, THEY DO NOT CARE.
It's aesthetics to them. They do not give a single solitary shit that they don't understand the themes and morals of dystopian novels. Hell, we know they don't understand what they read; Elon Musk made a great display of entirely misunderstanding the point of Hitchhiker's Guide. He doesn't care that he doesn't know what it means; to him, it means what he says it means. It means what he forces it to mean.
That is how he sees it.
That is also not an education problem. That is a problem of how self-interested fascists (same thing) behave and believe the world to work. No amount of education is going to fix that.
“Un coordinador que evaluĂł la soluciĂłn de IA para el problema 5 dijo que esta “podĂa adivinar el resultado final, pero no podĂa demostrar ninguna parte correctamente” y que, de haberla recibido de un estudiante, le habrĂa dado cero puntos y habrĂa informado al ComitĂ© de Ética.“

EL PAĂŤS reconstruye la historia de lo que muchos medios vendieron como “la noticia del año”, y algunos protagonistas califican de “vergĂĽenza”: el supuesto oro olĂmpico de las grandes tecnolĂłgicas, que eclipsĂł la competiciĂłn real de 600 chavales
I suspect LLMs reinforce the Gell-Mann amnesia effect. Experts who query LLMs about their fields of expertise will *quickly* realize how wrong their output can be, how quick they are to confabulate, and how eager they are to confirm one’s biases. Sometimes, replying “No, that’s wrong, try again” can cause an LLM to generate a completely different—and often opposite—answer to the same query, which makes no sense if the LLM had *actually* worked out an independently coherent answer.
Asking an LLM to comment about a subject you know nothing about—or worse, know a little bit about—is a psychologically dangerous activity. Not only will it confirm your biases, it will do so in a way that *appears* to be objective and independent, using fallacies that lie just beyond your ability to discern. At best, you will be misled. At worst, you will begin spiraling down a path of conspiracy thinking.
Be extremely suspicious of answers that are especially satisfying; you might have just gaslit yourself.
The US is not in decline because Trump rose to power.
Trump rose to power because the US is in decline.
Starting with Reagan and continuing with Clinton, we decided to sacrifice everything at the altar of making wealthy people wealthier. This is the inevitable result.
And please listen to Vlad when he warns that Trump is paving the way for a worse authoritarian regime to come later.
12â…“-minute video
https://youtu.be/f6fvHOOFYbw

Also, and I want to say more on this soon, but if you think that the big AI players are hoping for *anything but* them being able to put a legislative moat around themselves where output *is* copyrighted and training materials *are* restricted but they're the *only ones* able to play, you're being a fool.
Their key goal is to capture rent on all intellectual pursuits.
The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux
https://www.sambent.com/the-engineer-who-tried-to-put-age-verification-into-linux-5/
The lasting damage was knowing it could happen at all: that a single contributor with no stated organizational backing could submit compliance infrastructure for surveillance law directly into the software that boots your computer, get it merged by two Microsoft employees, and have the creator of systemd personally block the removal.

Dylan, useful idiot with commit access, pushed age verification PRs to systemd, Ubuntu & Arch, got 2 Microslop employees to merge it, called it 'hilariously pointless' in the PR itself, then watched Lennart personally block the revert. Unpaid compliance simp.