Electronic Frontier FoundationICE has spent hundreds of millions on surveillance. Some technologists are building tools to find it, map it, and push back. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/01/how-hackers-are-fighting-back-against-ice
Michael Barclay
@mbarc
- 30 Followers
- 58 Following
- 116 Posts
Part-time volunteer at Electronic Frontier Foundation (posts are my own). Former partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, specializing in patent, copyright, and trade secret law. I enjoy travel, playing the guitar and ukulele, cat videos, Taylor Swift concerts, and Oxford commas.
A three judge panel has upheld Proposition 50, the California redistricting initiative. By a 2-1 vote, it rejected the Republican's request for a preliminary injunction enjoining the new districts (a Trump-appointed judge dissented).
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.994285/gov.uscourts.cacd.994285.216.0.pdf
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.994285/gov.uscourts.cacd.994285.216.0.pdf
Copyright claims can’t be the gatekeeper to the internet. EFF urges SCOTUS to apply patent-law limits and stop overbroad secondary liability. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/09/eff-court-supreme-court-must-rein-expansive-secondary-copyright-liability
EFF to Court: The Supreme Court Must Rein in Expansive Secondary Copyright Liability
If the Supreme Court doesn’t reverse a lower court’s ruling, internet service providers (ISPs) could be forced to terminate people’s internet access based on nothing more than mere accusations of copyright infringement. This would threaten innocent users who rely on broadband for essential aspects...
Your internet shouldn’t vanish because a roommate is accused of copyright infringement. SCOTUS must rein in overbroad secondary liability that chills lawful access. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/09/eff-court-supreme-court-must-rein-expansive-secondary-copyright-liability
EFF to Court: The Supreme Court Must Rein in Expansive Secondary Copyright Liability
If the Supreme Court doesn’t reverse a lower court’s ruling, internet service providers (ISPs) could be forced to terminate people’s internet access based on nothing more than mere accusations of copyright infringement. This would threaten innocent users who rely on broadband for essential aspects...
SCOTUS should toss the Fourth Circuit’s made-up ‘material contribution’ test that stretches contributory liability and pressures ISPs to cut off whole households from the internet on mere accusations of copyright infringement. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/09/eff-court-supreme-court-must-rein-expansive-secondary-copyright-liability
EFF to Court: The Supreme Court Must Rein in Expansive Secondary Copyright Liability
If the Supreme Court doesn’t reverse a lower court’s ruling, internet service providers (ISPs) could be forced to terminate people’s internet access based on nothing more than mere accusations of copyright infringement. This would threaten innocent users who rely on broadband for essential aspects...
Zack Davisson
That Nonproductive GuyNew Signal update just dropped
evacideI'm just going to leave Freedom of the Press Foundation's excellent guide to leaking to the press right here in case anyone happens to need it: https://freedom.press/digisec/blog/sharing-sensitive-leaks-press/
DocAtCDI1. Go to Starbucks
2. Order a small black coffee
3. Tell them your name is Waldo
4. Leave
2. Order a small black coffee
3. Tell them your name is Waldo
4. Leave
