portuguese c++ qt app & sdl game developer. #supertux team
banner: The Slackers And Friends - The Slackers
| codeberg | https://codeberg.org/MatusGuy |
| github | https://github.com/MatusGuy |
| discord | matusguy |
| matrix | https://matrix.to/#/@matusguy:matrix.org |
| retroachievements | https://retroachievements.org/user/MatusGuy |
hello. tonight i bring the expression of my feelings towards radio.
it is excellent.
as someone with an eclectic music taste, all i need is some random ass alt music radio and i'm happy. if you don't mind not having full control of what you're listening to, which is my case, then radio is a great way to listen to music without a modern streaming platform. Just putting it out there. You don't have to suck youtube music's toes, bro
RE: https://social.treehouse.systems/@swags/116235865719541791
Today was the SuperTux 0.7.0 release (yay!), but some of us were alarmed by the "Claude contributed to this repo" message on GitHub (oh no!)
Well, I've learned a few things from the discussion about this topic.
A single PR "co-authored by Claude" has slipped through. The code was written by a human (according to the commit), then properly reviewed and eventually merged by a maintainer. The Claude contribution is attributed solely to the code comments added through a mid-PR-flow commit update.
And now the commit history will show Claude as a contributor. It might be impossible to rewrite it. Rewriting kind of goes against the idea of having the git history, too. Even if that was possible, it's an extra effort which not all maintainers can prioritise.
So: seeing "Claude was here" in a GitHub repo is a "red flag", but it shouldn't be "therefore guilty of slop and LLM proliferation by default"; please use your head/best judgement.
I guess it is a cautionary tale for the maintainers, too 
Nina Kalinina
🔲//AZ-art//🔳
n0toose
furry hater
SuperTux
Amber 
