
| web | https://8vi.cat |
| web | https://8vi.cat |

"“OpenAI repeatedly argued to European officials that the forthcoming AI Act should not consider its general purpose AI systems…to be “high risk,” a designation that would subject them to stringent legal requirements including transparency, traceability, and human oversight."
Oohh noooz our stuff is so strong it might render humanity extinct.
But also no no our stuff shouldn’t be classified “high risk.”
By @perrigo
The portable identity people always, inevitably forget one simple truth: the identity and the means of accessing it should be separable. I've explained them way too many times that a public key is not a viable form of identity. They still keep insisting on using public keys as identifiers.
The fatal flaw of the use of cryptographic keys for identity is that
- Once leaked, it can't be revoked to prevent further unauthorized access and impersonation
- Once lost, it can't be recovered and a new key pair, thus a new identity, is required
This stuff is non-negotiable really. I worked at VK, they have an entire department dedicated to restoring people's access to their accounts. People are terrible with passwords and they will be even more terrible with private keys.
I quan passem per Burjassot
recordem i no oblidem
companys i amics
que ja no hi són.
30 anys de l'assassinat de Guillem Agulló en mans del feixisme i de la seva impunitat.
Then you have "In March, two reviewers from Ms. Gennai’s team submitted their risk evaluation of Bard. They recommended blocking its imminent release, two people familiar with the process said. Despite safeguards, they believed the chatbot was not ready.
Ms. Gennai changed that document. She took out the recommendation and downplayed the severity of Bard’s risks, the people said."