| Google Scholar Profile | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=KI9IybAAAAAJ&hl=en |
| ResearchGate Profile | https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christoph-Lutz |
While the differences are not huge, this is my ranking.
🥇SAGE performs best.
🥈Taylor & Francis comes second.
🥉Elsevier and Emerald share the third place.
❓ Let me know if my impressions match yours and if there are additional aspects to consider!
#AcademicPublishing #Research #OpenAccess #AcademicWriting #ScholarlyCommunication #Publishers #publishorperish
👨💻 The table is based on my experience with Elsevier, SAGE, Taylor & Francis (T&F), Wiley, Springer, and Emerald, feat. criteria such as submission flexibility, article metrics, open access friendliness and reputation.
🎯 Key points
1️⃣ Flexibility & speed: Elsevier stands out.
2️⃣ Article metrics & proofing quality: SAGE and T&F offer good article metrics, SAGE and Emerald shine with proofing quality.
3️⃣ Rights retention/OA: SAGE and Emerald have strong rights retention, Springer leads OA-wise.
📚 In academic publishing, the publication venue strongly affects the work's visibility. Topical fit, prestige and impact matter most in submission decisions but something else often goes under the radar: the publisher role and user-friendliness.
🕵️ Having navigated the submission and publication process at major academic publishers, I've encountered large differences in their approach to submissions, publication speed, open access policies, and other factors.
Here's a comparison table and 🧵
@Lu_Tze Thank you very much for the kind and thoughtful feedback! My co-authors and I greatly appreciate it. This response is mostly based on Christian Hoffmann's thoughts (he's not on Mastodon) but reflects my view too.
Yes, those with more agency are more free to follow their privacy calculus. So if someone experiences less financial constraints, they are at more liberty to choose their subjectively ideal trade-off between providing data and enjoying services.
💬 We'd love to hear your thoughts and discuss ways to address privacy and agency challenges in today's digital society. How do you see these dynamics playing out?
👇 The article is part of a Big Data & Society special theme on digital resignation and privacy cynicism. Check out the fascinating articles published so far in the special theme: https://journals.sagepub.com/page/bds/digitalresignationandprivacycynicism
#privacy #agency #intersectionality #openaccess #DigitalDivide #digital #inequality #divide #constraints #DigitalResignation
✨ Excited to share our new paper, "Inequalities in Privacy Cynicism: An Intersectional Analysis of Agency Constraints," which was just published in Big Data & Society!
Christian P. Hoffmann, Giulia Ranzini and I examine how structural constraints limit user agency, leading to widespread privacy cynicism. Using an intersectional lens, we show the unequal impact constraints have on different social groups, thus shaping digital inequality. The article is freely available: https://lnkd.in/ehAYBT3B
