| Google Scholar Profile | https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=KI9IybAAAAAJ&hl=en |
| ResearchGate Profile | https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christoph-Lutz |
While the differences are not huge, this is my ranking.
🥇SAGE performs best.
🥈Taylor & Francis comes second.
🥉Elsevier and Emerald share the third place.
❓ Let me know if my impressions match yours and if there are additional aspects to consider!
#AcademicPublishing #Research #OpenAccess #AcademicWriting #ScholarlyCommunication #Publishers #publishorperish
👨💻 The table is based on my experience with Elsevier, SAGE, Taylor & Francis (T&F), Wiley, Springer, and Emerald, feat. criteria such as submission flexibility, article metrics, open access friendliness and reputation.
🎯 Key points
1️⃣ Flexibility & speed: Elsevier stands out.
2️⃣ Article metrics & proofing quality: SAGE and T&F offer good article metrics, SAGE and Emerald shine with proofing quality.
3️⃣ Rights retention/OA: SAGE and Emerald have strong rights retention, Springer leads OA-wise.
📚 In academic publishing, the publication venue strongly affects the work's visibility. Topical fit, prestige and impact matter most in submission decisions but something else often goes under the radar: the publisher role and user-friendliness.
🕵️ Having navigated the submission and publication process at major academic publishers, I've encountered large differences in their approach to submissions, publication speed, open access policies, and other factors.
Here's a comparison table and 🧵
💬 We'd love to hear your thoughts and discuss ways to address privacy and agency challenges in today's digital society. How do you see these dynamics playing out?
👇 The article is part of a Big Data & Society special theme on digital resignation and privacy cynicism. Check out the fascinating articles published so far in the special theme: https://journals.sagepub.com/page/bds/digitalresignationandprivacycynicism
#privacy #agency #intersectionality #openaccess #DigitalDivide #digital #inequality #divide #constraints #DigitalResignation
✨ Excited to share our new paper, "Inequalities in Privacy Cynicism: An Intersectional Analysis of Agency Constraints," which was just published in Big Data & Society!
Christian P. Hoffmann, Giulia Ranzini and I examine how structural constraints limit user agency, leading to widespread privacy cynicism. Using an intersectional lens, we show the unequal impact constraints have on different social groups, thus shaping digital inequality. The article is freely available: https://lnkd.in/ehAYBT3B
3️⃣ Our findings come with relevant #insights for the #tourism industry, providing actionable strategies to engage this dynamic segment of travelers. We are also contributing to the #theory of #liquid #modernity by examining the role of global disruptions like pandemics. 📘🔍
The paper is available #openaccess: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00472875231224242
#Research #TourismIndustry #Pandemic #LiquidModernity #liquid #modernity #AcademicTwitter #digitalnomads #nomadidigitali #remotework #remote #work
1️⃣ We investigate evolving patterns of #work and #travel among #digital #nomads based on an analysis of Reddit's r/digitalnomad over 3.5 years. We show how these highly mobile professionals blend their #careers with their love for #exploration. 🧳💼
2️⃣ From #destination reviews to #emotional needs and #regulation, we identify 15 #topics across 7 #clusters that are top of mind for digital nomads. 🗺️⚖️ The impact of the pandemic is significant, yet the community has high #resilience and #adaptability.
👩💻 New article in the Journal of Travel Research! This is the first publication of my amazing PhD supervisee Yunhao Xiao at BI Norwegian Business School. Big thanks for the great collaboration🙏 And congratulations on this achievement early in his PhD🎉🎊
https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231224242
Summary🧵 below
📰 Read the full paper for more. We have a detailed literature review of adjacent #LLM research and an in-depth discussion of #policy and #research implications.
🙏🏽 Huge thanks to my co-authors, Pawel and Gemma, and to Pawel's ILO colleagues for constructive feedback!
We hope the paper is useful for occupational researchers and those working on the use of #generativeai, including biases.
#ai #artificialintelligence #occupations #prestige #social #value #bias #futureofwork #technology