Leo Martins

260 Followers
180 Following
516 Posts

Computational Biologist. Tenure Track Fellow in Health at the University of Liverpool. 🇧🇷🇯🇵🇪🇸🇬🇧🇨🇭

Phylogenomics and Chemometrics. Prog Rock and Post-Punk. C and Python.

Leonardo de Oliveira Martins (he/him).

Personal pagehttps://leomrtns.github.io/
QIBhttps://quadram.ac.uk/people/leonardo-de-oliveira-martins/
Githubhttps://github.com/leomrtns
Google Scholarhttps://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=XvcsndkAAAAJ&hl=en

**Research institutions tout the value of scholarship that crosses disciplines – but academia pushes interdisciplinary researchers out**

https://theconversation.com/research-institutions-tout-the-value-of-scholarship-that-crosses-disciplines-but-academia-pushes-interdisciplinary-researchers-out-254034

"early career researchers often do the most innovative work. But at this formative career stage, they do not lend their talents to interdisciplinary work as frequently. (...)

Right now, academia rewards scholars who work within disciplinary boundaries and climb the departmental career ladder."

Research institutions tout the value of scholarship that crosses disciplines – but academia pushes interdisciplinary researchers out

Researchers who focus on one specialty are more likely to rise through the academic ranks, even though wicked societal problems require crosscutting work to solve.

The Conversation

The fear that *still exists* of GISAID is VERY REAL. Even today, respected, serious long-time scientists are scared to do anything that may be viewed as 'unloyal' to GISAID, for fear they, their work, and/or their departments are cut off.

Does that sound like how science should work? Not to me.

The conclusion is that true talent takes longer to blossom. Thus in my view, it's not that your bloom is later than it should be, as suggested by "late bloomer". It's that your talent is more complex (more interdisciplinary, as original papers suggest!), and thus it is natural that "success" will take longer.

Japanese word of the day is 大器晩成 (Tai Ki Ban Sei), inspired by https://bsky.app/profile/leomrtns.bsky.social/post/3magc4kieos22.

大器晩成 is usually translated as "late bloomer" but it's not that simple (most JP idioms don't fit into an English expression). If I remember correctly, it was a sign outside the workshop of a famous metalworker/pot maker. It literally means "big utensils will be ready only in the evening", meaning that complex, big pots or cauldrons or bells take longer to be finished than smaller, commodity pieces.

Leo Martins (he/him) (@leomrtns.bsky.social)

"Exceptional young performers reached their peak quickly but narrowly mastered only one interest (e.g., one sport). By contrast, exceptional adults reached peak performance gradually with broader, multidisciplinary practice. However, elite programs are designed to nurture younger talent." [contains quote post or other embedded content]

Bluesky Social

In the specific case it was like (I'll be creative), one of my students missed class and I asked Margie why Margie missed the class and Margie told me Margie couldn't find the room.

I guess I could replace Margie by "this student"? Anyway I don't want to oust Margie.

A lazy answer is that I should rephrase it in a way to avoid repetition. Easier said than done, specially for me. You could as well ask me "do not use pronouns. Talk about me in the style of Neoclassical poetry"

What should I do when a student has a "no pronouns, please. Just use my name" in their bio, but I want to generalise the issue or anonymise the student?

I like to use "they" since I'm emphasising that their gender doesn't matter ---in case our subconscious reads differently if HE made a mistake or SHE made the same mistake.

But if I say that Margie make a mistake you might be less lenient than for Homer. And I didn't want to say it was Margie to start with!

I was reminded today of a codeathon I joined a while ago, where the team lead was from Elsevier and wanted the rest of us to design an LLM to scan the (open) literature for something silly.

It was worse than unpaid internship: we worked FOR a predefined lead on their project, with core hours, in a ill-posed biological problem with no chance to protest.

Since I was getting paid by my employer under the assumption that I would benefit somehow from the hackathon, I didn't finish it...

I want to explain a few things and then it might be clearer why UK trans people are upset.

In 2001 I married my wife, Sylvia.

In 2005 I started medical transition. For the state to recognise this I had to submit to standards of "care" which were humiliating, degrading and which placed me at risk of violence.

But I did it "by the book"

As I did it "by the book", the NHS agreed to reregister me as female, which makes sense because my anatomy now is.

In 2007 I had sex reassignment surgery. This had to be signed off by two mental health professionals, "by the book", and it was.

In 2008 I applied for gender recognition. This involved signing a statutory obligation, stating that I promised, BY LAW, to live fully as female for the rest of my life. As this was done, "by the book", the government promised that it would treat me as such.

Its first act as treating me as female was to annul our marriage because it was a same sex marriage and those were not allowed.

The state then reissued my birth certificate, correcting the "mistake" it had originally made when it recorded me as male, "by the book".

In 2009 Sylvia and I married for the second time, in a same sex civil partnership, which was done "by the book", because the state regarded me as female and I was bound by law to be female.

In 2013 we married again, because the state decided that same sex marriage was in fact allowed after all. This was done, "by the book". Despite having been married for 12 years, we had to submit ourselves to individual questioning to prove our relationship was genuine, "by the book".

In April of 2025 the state turned round and told me that I had been mistaken. That it never regarded me as female. That I was male the whole time. That the marriage it annulled because it was a same sex marriage was never a same sex marriage (but it stays annulled). That the civil partnership in 2009 never really happened because "opposite sex" civil partnerships were not allowed in 2009.

And that the legal obligation I have to live as female for the rest of my life, which I signed and gave up my marriage for, is still in effect but also if I keep following it, I am breaking the law and subject to arrest. As it's still valid, presumably if I don't keep following it, I am also breaking the law and subject to arrest.

The law of the land simultaneously requires me to be both a man and a woman and if I do either then I am breaking the law and subject to arrest.

At every stage I did what the state asked me to, even though it was humiliating, degrading and cruel.

And it kept moving the goalposts, and reneging on the agreements it made, whilst continuing to hold me to them even when they are now mutually contradictory.

Apparently this is "all my fault" and I should have known that this would be the consequences of my actions when I started medical transition 2 decades ago.

Perhaps you can now appreciate why we are upset?

Listen, it’s very simple: In Britain we use the metric system, except for beer and milk, which come in pints. But not plant milk — that comes in litres.

Oh, and distances are in miles. But only if they’re too far to walk — if you can walk it it’s in metres. If you’re driving then your fuel efficiency is in miles-per-gallon, but petrol is sold in litres.

Oh, and your height is in feet and inches. If you don’t care much about your weight it’s in stone (but not pounds — no-one can remember how many pounds are in a stone and it’s hard to read the little tick marks on analogue scales). If you do care about your weight then your digital scales tell you it in kilograms.

Oh, and if there’s a heatwave then tabloids will forecast a “100°F scorcher”. But if it’s cold then it’s an “arctic blast” with “widespread temperatures below 0°C”.

I hope this clears things up.