| Home page | https://www.clayden.org |
docopt (http://docopt.org) is neat, but this heuristic (highlighted) seems very odd to me.
Since most options are optional(!), isn’t it easy enough to distinguish “[-i] ARG” or “[-i] [ARG]” from “[-i ARG]”?
Is there really no way to cajole docopt (for R) into handling argument-free options without forgoing self-documentation? Even “[ARG] [-i]” appears not to work… 🤔
If you use #rstats from the terminal regularly, and you have bat installed (https://github.com/sharkdp/bat), you can get syntax highlighting, line numbering and paging for function source with a simple one-liner in .Rprofile:
print.function <- function (x, ...) cat(deparse(x), file=pipe("bat -l r -n"), sep="\n")
Delighted to bring a brain image to the cover of a haematology journal 😊
In this new paper we show how characteristics of brain structure mediate the link between peripheral oxygen saturation and processing speed in patients with sickle cell disease
Key Points. Patients with sickle cell disease have weakened brain white matter connectivity compared with control subjects.Weakened connectivity mediates the re
The use of field-standard approaches in neuroscience and psychology can exclude participants from research, biasing our understanding of brain–behavior relations. Here the authors discuss how we might address inequity in our scientific methodology.
