Jonas Lang

@jlang
381 Followers
404 Following
39 Posts
Work and Organizational Psychologist based in Ghent, Belgium.
The average social science journal article now cites 5 times as many references as such an article did back in 1960
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-08404-0

First time sharing a new publication here 🥳

Sharing the Recipe: #Reproducibility and #Replicability in Research Across Disciplines

https://riojournal.com/article/89980/

This is work with @h2 and @HilmiBro87 + Florian Pethig (who has yet to migrate over to the fediverse). #openscience

Sharing the Recipe: Reproducibility and Replicability in Research Across Disciplines

The open and transparent documentation of scientific processes has been established as a core antecedent of free knowledge. This also holds for generating robust insights in the scope of research projects. To convince academic peers and the public, the research process must be understandable and retraceable (reproducible), and repeatable (replicable) by others, precluding the inclusion of fluke findings into the canon of insights. In this contribution, we outline what reproducibility and replicability (R&R) could mean in the scope of different disciplines and traditions of research and which significance R&R has for generating insights in these fields. We draw on projects conducted in the scope of the Wikimedia "Open Science Fellows Program" (Fellowship Freies Wissen), an interdisciplinary, long-running funding scheme for projects contributing to open research practices. We identify twelve implemented projects from different disciplines which primarily focused on R&R, and multiple additional projects also touching on R&R. From these projects, we identify patterns and synthesize them into a roadmap of how research projects can achieve R&R across different disciplines. We further outline the ground covered by these projects and propose ways forward.

Research Ideas and Outcomes
@EverydayMoggie @BrentToderian the road is under sea level so passes underneath the water
The changing buzzwords of business books

Miriam Quick reveals the most popular bombastic book titles, analysing 750 from the bestseller lists.

Minimal example in R for the classic 1935 sherif study on the autokinetic effect: library(multilevel)
data(sherifdat)
m1<-lme(y ~ time, random = list(group=pdSymm(~time),person=pdIdent(~1)),data=sherifdat)
m2<-update(m1,weights=varExp( form = ~ time))
summary(m2)
anova(m1,m2) https://twitter.com/jwblang/status/949342086742052865
Jonas Lang on Twitter

“Minimal example in R for the classic 1935 sherif study on the autokinetic effect: library(multilevel) data(sherifdat) m1&lt;-lme(y ~ time, random = list(group=pdSymm(~time),person=pdIdent(~1)),data=sherifdat) m2&lt;-update(m1,weights=varExp( form = ~ time)) summary(m2) anova(m1,m2)”

Twitter
Want to study emergence in groups? Our APA book chapter describes how emergence can be modeled using multilevel models https://t.co/8PwY9m6k3z. - Requires just a few lines of code in R. Also see our paper in Personnel Psychology https://t.co/gMjNwaoXJk (PM for copy). #emergence https://t.co/vreIzuJ44O https://twitter.com/jwblang/status/949340133563797504