Jorge Camacho

@jcamachor
198 Followers
120 Following
276 Posts
Design • Futures • Systems • Transitions

Research Affiliate - Institute for the Future | Co-Founder - Diagonal Estudio | Program Lead MA Design Studies CENTRO
https://medium.com/@j_camachor/

The biggest impact of #LLM has not been due to the technology's capabilities, but rather its flaws. Because the #AI revolution must succeed at any cost, but the actual tech is flawed, orgs demanding more AI outputs MUST lower their bar for quality.

This creates space for #UX malpractice to take root.

Designers who think they are fighting back against evil PMs who hate users and want to make bad products, are in reality committing an equally egregious sin.

https://productpicnic.beehiiv.com/p/aura-ux

Aura UX

Shortcuts to establishing the legitimacy of design sabotage your ability to achieve anything meaningful.

The Product Picnic

What makes LLMs work isn't deep neural networks or attention mechanisms or vector databases or anything like that.

What makes LLMs work is our tendency to see faces on toast.

To paraphrase or, rather, hijack that great phrase by Tom Atlee, I've come to believe that things will get worse and worse, faster and faster before they get better and better, slower and slower.

Significant paper.

Having said that, I wish those efficiency and quality gains would be leveraged to advance a semi-automated/augmented, cyborgian-centaurian four-day workweek instead of the workload rebound effect to which they will probably be deployed.

https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/centaurs-and-cyborgs-on-the-jagged

Centaurs and Cyborgs on the Jagged Frontier

I think we have an answer on whether AIs will reshape work....

One Useful Thing
The sad thing about “It’s easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism” is not that it’s harder to imagine the latter. It’s that we feel so far from achieving real transformation that our aspirations are measured by comparing two acts of mere imagination.

Are generative AI systems to the noosphere as genetically-modified organisms are to the biosphere?

This thought was sparked by this section in the Ezra Klein podcast with Alondra Nelson. For a few reasons climate change and nuclear proliferation don’t seem good analogies to me. Gen AI as the GMO of the noosphere seems to me a better way to capture the wickedness of the problem/opportunity.

Full interview here: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/11/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-alondra-nelson.html

Opinion | What Biden’s Top A.I. Thinker Concluded We Should Do

Alondra Nelson discusses how the public could benefit from an Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights.

The New York Times

Richest people in UK ‘use more energy flying’ than poorest do overall.

https://www.carbonbrief.org/richest-people-in-uk-use-more-energy-flying-than-poorest-do-overall/

Richest people in UK ‘use more energy flying’ than poorest do overall - Carbon Brief

The wealthiest people in the UK burn through more energy flying than the poorest use...

Carbon Brief

On degrowth: “Now, after the pandemic gave people in some parts of the world a chance to rethink what makes them happy, and as the scale of change necessary to address the climate crisis becomes clearer, its ideas are gaining more mainstream recognition — even as anxiety builds over what could be a painful global recession.”

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/13/economy/degrowth-climate-cop27/index.html

speculative design 😂
---
RT @[email protected]
No sabemos si es un perro, una pieza de arte contemporáneo o qué carajos.
https://twitter.com/Magalindita/status/1140364793330585601
La Maguita on Twitter

“No sabemos si es un perro, una pieza de arte contemporáneo o qué carajos.”

Twitter
Hice uno de estos: