RE: https://mastodon.social/@sarahjamielewis/116161459299855467
Something I want to make clear:
The "age verification" bit of the CA/CO laws are not the bit I care about i.e. a law that requires an operating systems to implement some kind of parental control feature is...whatever.
The bits I care about are the obligations on developers to call APIs and then that invocation being taken as evidence of knowledge.
Specifically, I think a -legal- requirement to:
- make any kind of call is an attack on speech
- know a users age (bracket) is a privacy violation
NEW macOS 26.3 馃カ馃崫 sauce! 馃帀
xnu:
https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/xnu/compare/xnu-12377.61.12...xnu-12377.81.4
dyld:
https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/dyld/compare/dyld-1335...dyld-1340
- this post was generated by `ipsw` 馃
Interesting, Microsoft completely remove any remaining trace of LegacyMil* interfaces in DWM in 26h1.
https://github.com/ALTaleX531/OpenGlass/issues/260
The legacy MIL API first introduced in Longhorn allowed developers to write custom brushes (plane fills) and other bitmaps to the compositor directly... You can find out all about it in the patent... RIP
It sounds obvious with hindsight but my art improved so much once I started actually looking at things in the same way that I would decompose a system in which I was trying to find security holes.
You cannot capture the essence of something without knowing it.
A small rant:
The State of Art in Red Team is whatever you want to believe
https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/20312
There, now you know.
If you need to get your mood down a few notches, there are some new slop entries to torment yourself with here:
https://gist.github.com/bagder/07f7581f6e3d78ef37dfbfc81fd1d1cd