I mostly agree with this, but it does leave the possibility that a human who doesn’t have access to a massive data repository can only produce “plausible sounding bullshit” if they have some understanding of the facts and semantics. If that assertion is wrong, education has been a mess since the essay supplanted the disputation.
From: @xgranade
https://wandering.shop/@xgranade/114535812260577583
Cassandra is only carbon now (@[email protected])
Thesis: ChatGPT is destroying education, students keep using it to cheat on homework and exams. Antithesis: ChatGPT has no understanding of facts or semantics. Synthesis: Homework and exams don't measure understanding of facts or semantics, and can be fooled by plausible-sounding bullshit.





