heridVery interesting interview with an applied topologist. Just as John Cook (the interviewer) I had no idea applied topology was a thing. Would not have thought homology can help with planning cellular network coverage. Apparently it does. #mathematics
Guilherme Duarte
- 78 Followers
- 309 Following
- 70 Posts
Happy new year
Seth MasketOver at the @denverpost, I have a piece up eulogizing not Twitter, but the intellectual community that Twitter once hosted. The piece is currently paywalled but here's a brief summary (1/4):
https://www.denverpost.com/2022/12/29/why-leave-twitter-seth-masket-rip-twitter/
https://www.denverpost.com/2022/12/29/why-leave-twitter-seth-masket-rip-twitter/
Anshul KundajeI find that we are reaching the break even point and mastodon (@kordinglab) is offering about equal quality of discussions as this place (despite a factor 9 smaller followership). They are just more engaged
🐦🔗: https://twitter.com/KordingLab/status/1608470393475694592
KordingLab 🦖 on Twitter
“I find that we are reaching the break even point and mastodon (@[email protected]) is offering about equal quality of discussions as this place (despite a factor 9 smaller followership). They are just more engaged”
NYTimesVivienne Westwood, 81, Dies; Brought Provocative Punk Style to High Fashion - The London shop she ran with Malcolm McLaren defined an era. “I don’t think punk would have happened,” Chrissie Hynde said, “without Vivienne and Malcolm.” #nytimes
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/29/fashion/vivienne-westwood-dead.html
Scott Gehlbach
angela zhouactually a very interesting rhetorical theoretical move http://bactra.org/weblog/942.html
Ugo PanizzaRT @ZinhoFFz
For me it was this @analisereal paper. Simple, concise and very easy to understand. I've been reviewing content on causal inference for my monograph and there's no better article to start understanding bad controls and the causal graph approach to causal inference than this paper https://twitter.com/instrumenthull/status/1606142852202913793
For me it was this @analisereal paper. Simple, concise and very easy to understand. I've been reviewing content on causal inference for my monograph and there's no better article to start understanding bad controls and the causal graph approach to causal inference than this paper https://twitter.com/instrumenthull/status/1606142852202913793
John Carlos BaezIf you're reading a proof that seems too good to be true, you should quickly get a sense of the whole argument, then focus on the parts that seem likely to be wrong.
You shouldn't take a portion of the proof that's correct, and optimize it. But that's what I've just done.
This new claimed proof of the 4-color theorem, just 6 pages long, uses a formula for counting rooted planar maps. But there's a simpler formula that would greatly simplify some of the arguments!
(1/n)
Emre KıcımanPlus, many expensive refutations now run in parallel, making them much faster (Thanks Andreas Stöffelbauer and Amey Verhade!) and as of DoWhy 0.9.1, DoWhy has cleaned up dependencies and supports python 3.10
See more in our release notes: https://github.com/py-why/dowhy/releases
If you want to see your favorite algorithm or feature in the next version of DoWhy, we have a contributor's guide (thanks to Michael Marien!) https://github.com/py-why/dowhy/blob/main/docs/source/contributing/contributing-code.rst
Open for discussions at our Discord and in GitHub issues
