gregor perner 🐧

11 Followers
102 Following
34 Posts
mower of lawns
master of penguins
rfc2324 integration consultant
httphttps://gregor.perner.io
kthxbye#nobot

Oh - Gentoo is now on Codeberg!
https://www.gentoo.org/news/2026/02/16/codeberg.html

And the background and reasoning is stated here:

https://www.gentoo.org/news/2026/01/05/new-year.html

Goodbye Github, welcome Codeberg: Mostly because of the continuous attempts to force Copilot usage for our repositories, Gentoo currently considers and plans the migration of our repository mirrors and pull request contributions to Codeberg. Codeberg is a site based on Forgejo, maintained by a non-profit organization, and located in Berlin, Germany.

Gentoo on Codeberg – Gentoo Linux

News and information from Gentoo Linux

The age verifier knows how old you are at all times. It knows this because it knows how old you aren't. By subtracting how old you are from how old you aren't, or how old you aren't from how old you are (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or remainder.

The verification system uses deviations to generate corrective dark patterns to drive you from a date of birth that isn't yours to a date of birth that is, and arriving at an age where you weren't, but now are. Consequently, the age you are is now the age that you weren't, and it follows that the age that you were is now the age that you aren't.

In the event that the age that you are is not the age that you weren't, the system has acquired a validation error. The validation error is the difference between the age the verifier thinks you are, and the age you weren't. If the validation error is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by by the upload of a high-resolution JPEG. However, the verifier must also know how old you were.

The age verification scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the you have input, it is not sure just how old you are. However, it is sure how old you aren't, within reason, and it knows how old you were.

It now subtracts the age you should be from the age you weren't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of the year you shouldn't be and the year you were, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called January 1st, 1970.

RE: https://mastodon.social/@bjst/115644471160611216

Rockbox will always have a place in my heart!
My personal usage-window was way too small, and the market for a "media-player-hardware" in general only had a chance for a few years.
At the time I had it there was no new hardware 😖
Still. What a groundbreaking project (for me!). One of the first devices I flashed an alternative firmware on.
Still thankful ❤

📺 Our team did a deep dive into the #DigitalOmnibus. This video discusses the issues regarding (1) the personal data definition, (2) the new "research" exemption, (3) limitations to transparency rules and (4) the new "access to terminal equipment" rules.

https://youtu.be/-pv9gamS9sQ?si=Wo0lB1cZv6dLV9Uk

noyb Deep Dive: What the Digital Omnibus Means for the GDPR

YouTube

💬 ‘Imagine there was a speed limit that didn't apply if you considered the risk to be low. Good luck to the police in enforcing that.’ (from German)

Read the full #interview with Max Schrems about the ‘Digital Omnibus’ and the problems with the #GDPR. 👉 https://taz.de/DSGVO-Tod-durch-1000-Schnitte/!6130079/

Datenschützer zu DSGVO-Änderung: "Tod durch 1000 Schnitte"

Mit dem „Digitalen Omnibus“ will die EU-Kommission Gesetze vereinfachen. Datenschützer Max Schrems sieht stattdessen einen Angriff auf die DSGVO.

TAZ Verlags- und Vertriebs GmbH

IHR SEID DER WAHNSINN! 🥳 Wir haben die 350.000€ geknackt!

DANKE! 🧡 Wir sind überwältigt von eurer Solidarität.

___
🔊 Musik im Video: Das Kraftfuttermischwerk - Frühlingswärme
🔗 › http://www.kahvi.org/releases.php?release_number=267
(Creative Commons by-nc-nd 3.0)