Fight for Us, Not for Them - live from Brussels

Fight for Us, Not for Them - live from Brussels

🎥 Recording available now! 🎥 @maxschrems recently took part in a panel discussion on the #DigitalOmnibus' compatibility with the Charter of Fundamental Rights. #CPDP2026 #Schrems

"The role of a paliament is to enable industry abuses, not curtail them"
-- doctrine of EPP and other neoliberal scoundrels.
On 16 June 2026, the European Parliament approved the agreed text of the Digital Omnibus on AI (423-57-174). A first-reading approval under Art. 294 TFEU: decisive, but not final. Council adoption, signature, and publication in the OJ are still pending; until then, the AI Act applies under its 2024 wording.
🔗 https://www.nicfab.eu/en/posts/digital-omnibus-ai-final-approval/

The European Parliament approves the agreed text of the Digital Omnibus on AI (423-57-174). What first-reading approval means, the new deadlines, the nudifier/CSAM ban, and the steps that remain before entry into force.
Guillermo Hidalgo, experto en propiedad intelectual y tecnologías de la información, protección de datos y sociedad de la información de Maio Legal, analiza el Reglamento de la IA (#RIA) y el #DigitalOmnibus.
El Reglamento de IA europeo frente a la realidad del mercado: ¿protección o ilusión regulatoria?

Europa ha construido el primer gran marco integral jurídico de Inteligencia Artificial (IA), la primera gran norma horizontal destinada a establecer un marco común para el desarrollo y uso de sistemas de IA en el mercado europeo. Sin embargo, la tecnología avanza más rápido que el desarrollo normativo, planteando

EPC and other European media organisations sent a letter to the Ministers in charge of the Digital Omnibus ahead of the Telecom Council meeting on 9th of June 2026. We are highly concerned by the disconnect between the omnibus's stated aim and the ongoing discussions regarding the text and its impact on publisher sustainability. Instead of simplifying rules, the Digital Omnibus introduces additional requirements and restrictions that will make it more difficult to process data in Europe. In eff
Le Digital Omnibus veut ajouter à l'article 4(1) du RGPD l'idée qu'une information ne serait pas « personnelle » pour qui ne peut pas, seul, identifier la personne.
Le CEPD et l'EDPB s'y opposent fermement : cette approche relative de l'identifiabilité s'écarte de la jurisprudence de la CJUE (arrêt Breyer) et réduirait la protection des personnes. À suivre de près.