Robert Edmonds

143 Followers
242 Following
222 Posts

@miekg I get a statically linked "hello world" build when I run `RUSTFLAGS='-C target-feature=+crt-static' cargo build --release --target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` but as soon as I pull in a crate dependency that dynamically links to a native library (e.g. openssl-sys), I necessarily end up with a dynamically linked binary.

Check your `cargo tree` output for "-sys" crate dependencies I guess?

After receiving the first LLM-generated pull requests, I have decided to blanket no longer look at those. When studying a PR, I take into account who made it, and if they've previously been careful developers. LLM-generated code I have no idea about, and the amount of scrutiny required is just too much. Because I have to assume you have no idea what you are doing.

@davidgerard
> For comparison, ProShares’ SPXT, which indexes the S&P minus all the tech stocks, is up about 40% in the past three years.

hmm check out the top 5 holdings of that fund, though

😮
> During construction both Swedish feet (of 29.69 cm) and Amsterdam feet (of 28.31 cm) were in use by different teams. Four rulers used by the workmen who built the ship have been found; two were calibrated in Swedish feet, of 12 Swedish inches, and the other two were calibrated in Amsterdam feet, of 11 Amsterdam inches. The use of different units of length on the two sides of the vessel caused the ship to be heavier on the port side.[104]
@zekjur 635 ppm is a great result under those conditions that means either active ventilation is in use (e.g. ERV/HRV) or high amounts of leakage across the building envelope. There is something called a blower door test that can be used to quantify the airtightness of a building.
@jpmens @winfried @cstrotm Using the lowest TTL in the RRset is consistent with RFC 2181 section 5.2.
@fanf Here is my U.S.-marketed kettle, labeled in liters and Fahrenheit. Also maxes out at 1.7 liters for some reason.

@adulau Oh, I remember when these mitigations came out. I believe this is the original paper: https://web.archive.org/web/20030708082653/http://www.remote.org/jochen/sec/hfpa/hfpa.pdf

The general problem is text based protocols that could be spoofed well enough by the HTTP request generated by something like an HTML form submission that it could be confused for that protocol. So like sending spam to an SMTP server or sending abusive messages to an IRC channel or something.

Modern SMTP servers will have defenses against these kinds of attacks, for instance delaying the server's initial 220 banner and detecting clients that speak before the 220 is sent, or detecting SMTP clients that are sending a sequence of commands before waiting for the server's response, etc.

Wayback Machine

@pgl I figure RFCs 1034/1035 are the 4th birthday of DNS since RFCs 882/883 are from November 1983.
@ondrej @jtk ADDITIONAL: 1 is probably the EDNS OPT RR (unless dig decrements the displayed count for the EDNS RR which I can't remember if it does), AUTHORITY: 1 is probably an NCACHE SOA?