@selzero So psyched about this development.
And yes, the irony is delicious
@selzero So psyched about this development.
And yes, the irony is delicious
@lakens @tomhardwicke
Excellent, although one thing that has always bothered me, honestly, is that N, p, and d (or r, if you prefer) are basically determined by a single equation. So if you know two, you know the third.
This is actually consistent with Fischer's original interpretation of the p value (which he regarded as more or less parallel to effect size). So calling for not using p values is silly, and reporting p without d or r is redundant, but easier for the reader!
In this day and age, it seems anything, no matter how outrageous, is supported by a third of the population....
Scientific journals may counter the misuse, misreporting, and misinterpretation of statistics by providing guidance to authors. We described the nature and prevalence of statistical guidance at 15 ...
Are there recommendations for reporting of effect sizes?
@daersay
FWIW, if you search for the first online, you get redirected to the second....
That having been said, I maintain my allegiance to team Snuffeluffagus!
Throwing this out into the ether, but, fellow Mastodonites, is there any way to get a timeline for another mastodon instance?
I can see my own local timeline, and the timeline across all instances, but I can't find a way to follow an instance rather than just one specific user on an instance.
Am I missing something?
And not to be opaque, I'm interested in what the mathstodon.xyz people are saying, but also sciences.social, etc...