Amazon apparently wanted to make it harder to cancel Prime.

So they allegedly added a complex cancellation process to confuse consumers.

Now the FTC is suing Amazon for scamming millions.

Good.

This is what it looks like when government works on behalf of the people.

SCOTUS struck down AA b/c it’s allegedly discriminatory. Here’s the Facts:
•AA benefitted white women more than all other groups COMBINED—plaintiffs never complained about that
•43% of white Harvard students are legacy or athlete students, of which 75% would not be admitted otherwise—plaintiffs never complained about that
•Asians are 6% of the population & 26% of Harvard admissions—plaintiffs never complained about that

This SCOTUS ruling is 100% anti-fact & 100% anti-Black racism.

It’s time to end legacy admissions. Each year thousands of students are admitted to colleges around the nation only because their parents went there.

Legacy admissions are back-door discriminatory policies that overwhelmingly advantage wealthy, white students over everyone else.

Google admits Reddit protests make it harder to find helpful search results

Search term + Reddit = John Oliver?

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/06/google-admits-reddit-protests-make-it-harder-to-find-helpful-search-results/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

Satellite view of #smoke from Canadian #wildfires over Portugal and Spain today 💨

Explore this imagery here: https://zoom.earth/maps/satellite-hd/#view=38.34,-7.13,6.54z/date=2023-06-27,pm

The income cap on Social Security taxes is rigged for the rich.

A CEO earning $20 million a year pays Social Security taxes on ~1% of their income.

Meanwhile, a normal worker earning under the cap pays Social Security taxes on 100% of their income.

How does that make any sense?

https://youtu.be/GfZuB7XSFys

The Supreme Court has clarified the subjective component of the "true threats" test, making the First Amendment's exception for true threats a bit clearer

https://popehat.substack.com/p/supreme-court-clarifies-true-threats