| Website | https://danieldk.eu/ |
| GitHub | https://github.com/danieldk/ |
| Pronouns | he/him/his |
| Website | https://danieldk.eu/ |
| GitHub | https://github.com/danieldk/ |
| Pronouns | he/him/his |
@punissuer @jonsnow It comes with a lot of issues too, like sites/apps could leak birth dates by repeatedly probing until a boundary is found and the reference implementation requires passing of strong integrity in Google Play Integrity, which shuts out alternative operating systems.
But fight the real thing (especially being bound to Google/Apple, it's nice that the EU tries to do it in a privacy-preservint way) and not some caricature.
@punissuer @jonsnow that's not how the EU age attestation proposal and reference implementation work though. They use privacy-preserving attestation using zero-knowledge proofs (which has issues too).
So, age proofs would be tied to authentication in e.g. a national ID app (such as DigiD in the Netherlands), which would basically return a true/false to sites for an age check.
It won't work with silly photo scans like some other countries.
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/faqs/eu-age-verification-solution
@jonsnow I hate these attacks on privacy as most people here, but the title does a lot of editorializing for clicks.
First, the linked paper doesn't say what the EU wants, but states that 'some people say'. Second, they don't want to forbid VPNs I general, they seem to want to require age attestation for VPNs as well to close the loophole of visiting a site from a country without age verification.
I think in fighting these things, it's good to be precise and not sling clickbait.
Excited to announce that the @EUCommission has updated it's follow buttons on the website footer!
What's that first platform there? Could that be #Mastodon?
And where did the link to #X go?
All the posts and comments here on Mastodon calling for this, trust me we read them!
Whether you love or hate LLMs, their longest-lasting legacy for programmers will be:
"Thank $DEITY, I do not have to write #GitHub Actions Workflows anymore."
In 2002, the US was ranked 17 in the Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index, Ukraine was at position 112.
In 2026, the US is at position 64 and Ukraine at is ranked at 55.
For the first time in the history of the Reporters Without Borders (RSF) World Press Freedom Index, over half of the world’s countries now fall into the “difficult” or “very serious” categories for press freedom. In 25 years, the average score of all 180 countries and territories surveyed in the Index has never been so low. Since 2001, the expansion of increasingly restrictive legal arsenals — particularly those linked to national security policies — has been steadily eroding the right to information, even in democratic countries. The Index’s legal indicator has declined the most over the past year, a clear sign that journalism is increasingly criminalised worldwide. In the Americas, the situation has evolved significantly, with the United States dropping seven places and several Latin American countries sliding deeper into a spiral of violence and repression.