83 Followers
452 Following
1.3K Posts

Sentient flower. Has root permissions. Memory unsafe IRL.
Occasional absurdist humor with varying degrees of self-filtering.

Rust programmer. Arch user. European. Interested in consumer rights, cybersecurity, FOSS, systems, and our right to decide what our computers do.

I try to keep a good signal-to-noise ratio.

Follow requests for vibe checking. I won't bite.
Unless you kinda like it.

Straight and cis most of the time. Any pronoun is fine.

Every developer or dev team can relate -

#dev #development #Tech #techdev

Did you know we added the ability to end tasks directly from the taskbar in Windows 11?

So you don't need to open task manager - when enabled you can just right click an app and end it from that menu

#Windows #Tips

@monsieuricon The purpose of anti-cheat is to prove that you haven't tampered your system in certain ways, yet Linux is FOSS and allows you to do "basically anything". The game developer would need to be able to execute code on the user's computer in a way that prevents user's control of their own computer.

On the face of it I don't see how Linux is compatible with that, and I'm not really a fan of introducing & normalizing such a mechanism either.

▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ 97%

@joomy

I once read a story about the people writing the software for the NASA Apollo missions. There was a functionary in charge of weight accounting, who came to them and asked how much the software would weigh.

They told him it weighted nothing, but the functionary had heard *that* one before and insisted—everything had to be accounted down to the last ounce. He demanded to see it.

They showed him a stack of punched cards, and he was triumphant. “You see,” he said smugly, “it doesn't weigh only ‘nothing’!”

“No, you misunderstand,” they replied. “The cards aren't going on the spacecraft. Only the holes.”

the UNIX v4 tape reminded me of this story by Ali Akurgal about Turkish bureaucracy:

Do you know what the unit of software is? A meter! Do you know why? In 1992, we did our first software export at Netaş. We wrote the software, pressed a button, and via the satellite dish on the roof, at the incredible speed of 128 kb/s, we sent it to England. We sent the invoice by postal mail. $2M arrived at the bank. 3-4 months passed, and tax inspectors came. They said, “You sent an invoice for $2M?” “Yes,” we said. “This money has been paid?” they asked. “Yes,” we said. “But there is no goods export; this is fictitious export,” they said! So we took the tax inspectors to R&D and sat them in front of a computer. “Would you press this ‘Enter’ key?” we asked. One of them pressed it, then asked, “What happened?” “You just made a $300k export, and we’ll send its invoice too, and that will be paid as well,” we said. The man felt terrible because he had become an accomplice! Then we explained how software is written, what a satellite connection is, and how much this is worth. They said, “We understand, but there has to be a physical goods export; that’s what the regulations require.” So we said: “Let’s record this software onto tape (there were no CDs back then—nor cassettes; we used ½-inch tapes) and send that.” Happy to have found a solution, they said, “Okay, record it and send it.” The software filled two reels, which were handed to a customs broker, who took them to customs and started the export procedure. The customs officer processed things and at one point asked, “Where are the trucks?” The broker said, “There are no trucks—this is all there is,” and pointed to the tape reels on the desk. The customs officer said, “These two envelopes can’t be worth $2M; I can’t process this.” We went to court, an expert committee examined whether the two reels were worth $2M. Fortunately, they ruled that they were, and we were saved from the charge of fictitious export. The same broker took the same two reels to the same customs officer, with the court ruling, and restarted the procedure. However, during the process, the unit price, quantity, and total price of the exported goods had to be entered—as per the regulations. To avoid dragging things out further, they looked at the envelope, saw that it contained tape, estimated how many meters of tape there are on one reel, and concluded that we had exported 1k to 2k meters of software. So the unit of software became the meter.

@GossiTheDog "don't make me open mspaint" is a threat I plan on using in catastrophically dumb meetings.
@mcc You don't need two editors for this, just a me that habitually deletes the newline that the editor inserts.

In a move that will surprise nobody except British “safety” activists who are unused to the concept of “positive rights”, Age Verification has been declared unconstitutional in Louisiana

For various reasons today has been a pretty shit day, but this offers a spark of hope:

“…the law, which conditioned Louisianans’ ability to access protected speech online on their willingness to hand over sensitive government ID, violates the First Amendment”

Obligatory Babylon 5: The avalanche has already started, it’s too late for the pebbles to vote.

https://netchoice.org/netchoice-wins-permanent-block-of-louisiana-age-verification-law-protecting-free-speech-and-parental-rights/

Via:

https://twitter.com/prestonjbyrne/status/2001333065742954814?s=20

#ageVerification #censorship #feed #Louisiana #onlineSafety #onlineSafetyAct #surveillance #vpns

NetChoice Wins Permanent Block of Louisiana Age Verification Law, Protecting Free Speech and Parental Rights - NetChoice

BATON ROUGE, La.—Today, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana granted NetChoice’s motion for summary judgment in NetChoice v. Murrill, striking down Louisiana’s Act 456. The court […]

NetChoice