Code: http://github.com/ekimb/mapquik
Preprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.23.521809v2

| Website | https://people.csail.mit.edu/ekim |
| Github | https://github.com/ekimb |
| https://twitter.com/ekimbarisc | |
| Keybase | https://keybase.io/ekimb |
What are y'all's favorite LaTeX templates/document classes to use for a submission to a journal that doesn't provide a template these days?
They do have a couple requirements I could add on pretty easily (spacing etc.), but in general I'm just looking for something pretty.
#algorithmicbioinformatics peeps!
Say, hypothetically, I wanted to test a new read mapper/pairwise aligner for Nanopore reads.
For synthetic reads, what is the length and error-rate I should aim for, and is there a specific tool to simulate Nanopore reads (I'm using pbsim with 10% and 25kb right now, and I'm aware of nanosim, though I'd like to use something simpler, if it exists)?
For real data, what's the most current read set (and reference) people like to use for benchmarking?
Thanks!
I agree with @emiller - Twitter feels more public (especially to senior academics with thousands of followers), and (from my experience), they feel reluctant to engage with trainees/grad students.
So far, my experience here has been the opposite, though - and I like that. For me, it's never been about promoting work (I have nothing to promote anyway), but I'm hoping to get insight + pointers from senior academics (which I was hoping I'd find at Twitter, and that was disappointing).
Just a week or two in and I fking love this place so much. It's like stumbling out of the noise and into the kitchen at a party, and finding your people right there all the time.
You miss the friends you left behind in the shouty room where most who talk to you are looking over your shoulder to see if there's anyone more important to latch onto, but you hope your friends will soon find the kitchen, too.