Nicolas Saunier

@aphex_twin
108 Followers
183 Following
5.1K Posts
Prof at Polytechnique Montreal
Intelligent and active transport, road safety, and data science/AI for transport
themestransport, artificial intelligence, open science, open source
homepagehttps://nicolas.saunier.confins.net
bloghttps://opentransport.bearblog.dev

"Iran’s use of LEGO set rap music tells me it’s been studying us. These are videos meant for the American people crafted in a language Iran knows we’ll understand."

https://www.404media.co/iran-is-winning-the-ai-slop-propaganda-war/

Iran Is Winning the AI Slop Propaganda War

“White House videos—AI or otherwise—are like group-chat in-jokes aimed at keeping cohesion.”

404 Media
Imagine knowing you're going to space and thinking you should bring Outlook with you.

Trump’s Easter message of love, delivered with his customary dignity and civility. 😉

Nothing says "leader of superpower" more clearly than a sweary tantrum on social media delivered like a drunken redneck whose truck has run away with his third wife.

If Trump hadn't already won this war 11 times, I'd be worried that he wasn't doing so well. 🙄

#Easter #Trump #Iran #Hormuz #tantrum

This is someting I wish I'd realized a lot sooner in life.
"Writing compels us to think — not in the chaotic, non-linear way our minds typically wander, but in a structured, intentional manner. By writing it down, we can sort years of research, data and analysis into an actual story, thereby identifying our main message and the influence of our work. This is not a philosophical observation; it is backed by scientific evidence. Handwriting can lead to widespread brain connectivity and has positive effects on learning and memory." https://www.nature.com/articles/s44222-025-00323-4
Writing is thinking - Nature Reviews Bioengineering

On the value of human-generated scientific writing in the age of large-language models.

Nature
My wife just asked me if Github was a tech version of Pornhub and I didn't have an adequate argument that it wasn't
And it was the most predictable thing ever to happen.

"I used AI. It worked. I hated it." by @mttaggart https://taggart-tech.com/reckoning/

This is a really good blogpost. And I"m sure it'll make some people unhappy to read whether they're pro or anti genAI. What's good about @mttaggart's blogpost is he talks honestly about how using Claude Code did actually solve the problem he set out to do. It needed various guardrails, but they were possible to set up, and the project worked. But the post is also completely clear and honest about how miserable it was:

- It removed the joy from the process
- If you aim to do the right thing and carefully evaluate the output, your job ends up eventually becoming "tapping the Y key"
- Ramifications on people learning things
- Plenty of other ethical analysis
- And the nagging wonder whether to use it next time, despite it being miserable.

I think this is important, because it *is* true that these tools are getting to the point where they can accomplish a lot of tasks, but the caveat space is very large (cotd)

I used AI. It worked. I hated it.

I used Claude Code to build a tool I needed. It worked great, but I was miserable. I need to reckon with what it means.