Security firm Cybereason has open-sourced owLSM, an EDR-like agent for Linux, an eBPF LSM agent to run Sigma rules

https://github.com/Cybereason-Public/owLSM

My biggest problem with the concept of LLMs, even if they weren’t a giant plagiarism laundering machine and disaster for the environment, is that they introduce so much unpredictability into computing. I became a professional computer toucher because they do exactly what you tell them to. Not always what you wanted, but exactly what you asked for.

LLMs turn that upside down. They turn a very autistic do-what-you-say, say-what-you-mean commmunication style with the machine into a neurotypical conversation talking around the issue, but never directly addressing the substance of problem.

In any conversation I have with a person, I’m modeling their understanding of the topic at hand, trying to tailor my communication style to their needs. The same applies to programming languages and frameworks. If you work with a language the way its author intended it goes a lot easier.

But LLMs don’t have an understanding of the conversation. There is no intent. It’s just a mostly-likely-next-word generator on steroids. You’re trying to give directions to a lossily compressed copy of the entire works of human writing. There is no mind to model, and no predictability to the output.

If I wanted to spend my time communicating in a superficial, neurotypical style my autistic ass certainly wouldn’t have gone into computering. LLMs are the final act of the finance bros and capitalists wrestling modern technology away from the technically literate proletariat who built it.

All of these AI coding advocates talking about creating good docs and APIs, yes, please. Programming in natural language? OK, let my ADHD take you somewhere unexpected.

Larry Wall studied linguistics at Berkeley with the intent of discovering an unwritten language on a Christian mission to Africa and developing a written language for it. For health reasons, he couldn't make the trip and stayed in the US where he joined the JPL and created Perl. I worked with Larry at craigslist and attended many Perl conferences where he spoke. One of the guiding principles of the design of the language was natural language. I'm probably misquoting, but the phrase I remember was, he wanted "a language that mimicked the sloppiness and unpredictability of natural language so it could grow with you." I happen to love Perl because of this. Some of my earliest contributions to perlmonks.org were Perl Poetry [1](https://perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=40275), [2](https://perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=37997).

What's it got to do with AI? Whenever I hear someone explain to me they want to use natural language to write code, I think of Larry and Perl. I posted this story and asked "Can someone explain to me how using AI generated code is better than Perl?" And now none of the AI people want to talk to me!

#fuck_ai #ai #fuck_with_ai #perl