"Why can't we just agree to disagree on politics?"
My dude.
- Agree to disagree was called pro-choice. You ended it and shoved authoritarian control of women's bodies down our throats.
- Agree to disagree was called LGBTQ inclusion. You banned it from schools, libraries, bathrooms, sports and the military.
- Agree to disagree was called Black Lives Matter. You mocked it and spat on it and threatened us with violence if we "try that in a small town".
- Agree to disagree was called Democracy. You traitors tried to kill it and install a military coup of your orange god emperor instead.
So no. Apparently, "we" CAN'T agree to disagree. And that's entirely your fault.
I finally had the logic of backing in to perpendicular parking spaces explained to me in a way that makes sense.
• The driver’s visibility ahead of the vehicle is better than behind it
• There are more potential hazards in the traffic lane than in the parking space
So nose-in-back-out puts the better visibility in the zone of lesser hazard, where back-in-nose-out applies the better visibility to the zone with the greater hazard.
NEW TO F1? Our Preseason Primer podcast is here!
We explain how Formula 1 works and who everybody is, all while assuming no prior knowledge of racing.
Welcome to your new favorite sport!
Listen: https://www.f1.cool/blog/216
Twitterrific has been discontinued. A sentence that none of us wanted to write, but have long felt would need to be written someday. We didn’t expect to be writing it so soon, though, and certainly not without having had time to notify you that it was coming. We are sorry to say that the app’s […]