There's a lot of talk about passkeys recently and how they're not as good as strong, random, unique passwords in terms of UX and security. I agree with the UX part: the industry needs to converge on better and more consistent passkey UX in order for this to become mainstream and useful long-term.
But I don't agree on the security front: the phishing resistance property of passkeys is much better than passwords. @iamkale explains it well in his article: https://blog.millerti.me/2024/10/18/password-managers-arent-replacements-for-passkeys/

Password managers aren't replacements for passkeys
There was some recent discourse about passkeys that bemoaned that they have so many issues that it’s better to stick with a password manager. The idea is that maintaining strong, unique passwords via a password manager is easier for users to understand. This completely misses the key point about why passkeys are such a stronger way of protecting login, though, so I decided to spend some time to compare the two approaches.