Parental Advisory: explicit contempt.
Cuius rei demonstrationem mirabilem sane detexi. Hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet.
| Dinged | 52 times |
| Location | Ruhrgebeat |
| Diagnosis | AuDHD |
| Basic bytes free | 38911 |
| Dinged | 52 times |
| Location | Ruhrgebeat |
| Diagnosis | AuDHD |
| Basic bytes free | 38911 |
Significant raise of reports (on the Linux Kernel Mailing List) https://lwn.net/Articles/1065620/
Here's something I think we all will have to contend with, whether you're an AIgen enthusiast or not: attacking is easier than defending, and these things don't get tired and they *are* very good at finding exploits. None of us will be able to ignore that, and we will probably have to listen to real genuine reports from them, even if we reject AIgen input.
However, I don't think that's actually the right solution, and I don't think it's sustainable. 🧵
Ja, das wird bestimmt … viel Geld kosten. Und wieder … nicht zusammenpassen.
RE: https://hachyderm.io/@inthehands/116331095877491094
“It's okay, I'm just using it for training.”
@inthehands The thing is, the SCOTUS just confirmed that there’s no copyright in “AI” generated output. And Anthropic has boasted about how Claude codes Claude so, as numerous IP lawyers like me have warned, Anthropic is in a pickle. They’d *like* to say they have copyright and no one cans scrape and use it, but they’re in court arguing it’s legal for companies (them) to use whatever they can get their hands on, so… [insert gif of tiniest tiny violin] 😂
Background: https://www.theverge.com/policy/887678/supreme-court-ai-art-copyright