Fudo Myoö

@Occamstazer
63 Followers
143 Following
2.8K Posts
from that bird app as @Occamstazer

Things Trump did that were NOT "official acts":

- inciting the mob on J6
- activating fake electors
- bullying Pence into exceeding his authority
- trying to get DOJ to make false claims of election fraud
- leading a conspiracy to keep himself in office after he KNEW he lost

“Take the now classic example of a president ordering Seal Team Six to assassinate a political rival. According to the logic of the Republicans on the Supreme Court, that would likely be an official act.” https://www.thenation.com/article/society/trump-immunity-supreme-court/ #ExpandTheCourt
The President Can Now Assassinate You, Officially

Under this new standard, a president can go on a four-to-eight-year crime spree and then retire from public life, never to be held accountable.

The Nation

Mystal:

Here's a question: Why would any president ever be impeached now? If presidents are absolutely immune from prosecution for "high crimes," then what's the theory of a future impeachment? "The President is allowed to do this, but we don't like it"?

Like, remember when Mitch McConnell argued that they *didn't* have to convict Trump in the Senate because he remains legally accountable for all he did as President?

That, turns out, was a lie.

Via Ron Filipkowski:

The American public must now understand, in the wake of today’s decision, that #Trump would now enter office knowing for certain exactly how he can abuse power and commit crimes using the power of the federal government, something he did not know last time. A frightening prospect.

Mike Luckovich- Above the Law - Democratic Underground Forums

"The GOP and right wing leaning Supreme Court have gone rogue, detached from reality and abandoned the truth. If Biden invokes a mob and sends it to attack the Supreme Court/congress, would the GOP accept that or hold Biden accountable?”

“The president can now assonate you, officially… The Supreme Court failed to recognize that they themselves could be targeted.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/live-blog/trump-immunity-supreme-court-ruling-live-updates-rcna159539

Live updates: Supreme Court rules Trump has some immunity in D.C. election interference case

Live updates and the latest news coverage as Supreme Court justices decide on presidential immunity for Donald Trump.

NBC News

Yanomami people threatened by Defence Minister José Múcio!

He suggested that mining companies should have access to Brazil's largest Indigenous Land as a way of replacing illegal mining.

#Brazil #Yanomami #indigenous #mining
https://www.socioambiental.org/noticias-socioambientais/nao-solucao-de-mucio-para-invasao-da-terra-yanomami?utm_source=isa&utm_medium=&utm_campaign=

A não solução de Múcio para a invasão da Terra Yanomami | ISA

O presidente e sócio fundador do ISA, Márcio Santilli, comenta afirmação feita pelo ministro da Defesa, José Múcio, que defendeu o acesso de empresas de mineração à maior Terra Indígena do país

Instituto Socioambiental - ISA
So an "official act would be to order the DOJ to investigate charges of corruption of, say, a public official.
As his first official act under this ruling, Biden should have Roberts, Alito and Thomas investigated for corruption. Just follow the money.

Justice Sotomayor read large portions of her 30-page dissent, often glaring at Roberts:

“Orders the Navy’s Seal Team 6 to assassinate a political rival? Immune,” she continued. “Organizes a military coup to hold onto power? Immune. Takes a bribe in exchange for a pardon? Immune. Immune, immune, immune.”

#scotus #scrotus
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4749875-sotomayor-immunity-decision-dissent/

From the food we eat to the air we breathe, federal regulations are needed to save lives. The SCOTUS Chevron decision that allows courts to overrule experts at agencies, shows that ultimately governments care more about industry profits than our health.

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-chevron-regulations-environment-4ae73d5a79cabadff4da8f7e16669929

Supreme Court Chevron decision: What it means for federal regulations

Executive branch agencies will likely have more difficulty regulating the environment, public health, workplace safety and other issues under a far-reaching decision Friday by the Supreme Court. The court’s ruling overturned a 1984 decision colloquially known as Chevron that has instructed lower courts to defer to federal agencies when laws passed by Congress are not crystal clear. The 40-year-old decision has been the basis for upholding thousands of regulations by dozens of federal agencies, but has long been a target of conservatives and business groups who argue that it grants too much power to the executive branch, or what some critics call “the administrative state.”

AP News