Mastodawn

So Ars Technica "wrote" an "article" about the "AI" bot instructed to puke some slop pretending to be discriminated against, and the Ars article contained "comments" from a developer that were not in the linked article, and were, in fact, entirely made up, 99% likely by "AI", possibly because the Ars author instructed the "AI" to summarize the linked article, and now Ars has deleted the "article" and comments?

How ever could this happen to a for-profit website owned by a giant media conglomerate who also sold their content rights to "AI" companies? It will always remain a mystery.

https://infosec.exchange/@mttaggart/116065340523529645

Taggart (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up. https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

Infosec Exchange

🔥

As a fan of Babylon 5 but frustrated it's not more readily available, I'm very happy to hear Warner Bros has released it for free on YouTube (https://cordcuttersnews.com/babylon-5-is-now-free-to-watch-on-youtube/).

Babylon 5 Is Now Free to Watch On YouTube | Cord Cutters News

In a move that has delighted fans of classic science fiction, Warner Bros. Discovery has begun uploading full episodes of the iconic series Babylon 5 to YouTube, providing free access to the show just as it departs from the ad-supported streaming platform Tubi. The transition comes at a pivotal time for the series, which has […]

Cord Cutters News

NIB Feb 14