Michalis Kamprianis

50 Followers
56 Following
61 Posts

Is ghosting during your job search, and lack of response frustrating? Are you in Europe?
Here's a way to get back at them: When you're sure you won't get a response, ask for a DSAR and if that's not enough, ask for a data deletion request. In the requests, hint the reason.

That will make the rest of the organization chase the ghosting recruiter until they change their practices ;)

Because if you are committed to create the update for the Pro customers, then the effort is already made, so it should be available for all customers.
Furthermore, and although English is not my native language, I'm sure that the following doesn't make sense.
Well, here it is. Ubuntu Pro is now required for updates in the Universe repository, even on LTS systems. That was not the case in the past, as our friend GPT is telling us (GPT's knowledge stops in 2020).

Of course, they could go on and tell you one of the two things: "we didn't submit you" or "we submitted you but you weren't selected".
Having this information, one might try or not to approach the company through alternative channels. Not having this information is baffling.

Whenever I see jobs I like, posted by recruiting companies, I try to find out which is the real company with that opening, and if they have this job advertised, I apply to the company directly.

Which is not so difficult, considering how lazy some people are in transforming the job description to a job post; usually and for the not so professionals, just a copy / paste activity.

We all complain about not getting answers when applying, but here is what I have observed (repeatedly).

When you apply to companies, you get an answer in 80% of the cases. It may be a negative answer, and with no useful data telling you why you were not selected, but it is an answer.

When you apply to recruiting companies, you rarely get an answer. The reason for that may be that they may not have the role exclusively (or not at all). Don't just assume that they're bad, heartless, emotionless people; they may just not be authorized to reject you at all!

I switched over from Twitter, which I hardly ever used to post due to workload, here, where I hardly ever post, due to the same reason. Occasionally, I wonder why I keep these accounts. Especially with the toxicity and drama (and attention seeking) that pops up from time to time. But there is some threat intelligence here and on Twitter that I don't find as easily / as early in other platforms.
Let’s Encrypt deployed new CAA extensions to production today.
The first allows subscribers to restrict issuance to particular ACME accounts. This is important, for example, for subscribers that want to allow issuance from Let’s Encrypt but require issuance for the domain to happen via a certain account that can be centrally controlled. Previously some subscribers have wanted to enable Let’s Encrypt but worried about anyone in the org being able to issue with no oversight.
The second allows for restricting the validation methods that can be used (DNS, HTTP, or TLS-ALPN). If a subscriber believes one method to be more secure, or is preferable for any other reason, they can require its use now.
I don’t really expect these to become widely used, but for some subscribers and organizations they will be important controls.
And now there are 10 candidates...

There is a "Director - Information/Cyber Security" job post in LinkedIn, with no text. It was probably posted accidentally, as the job description is (copied from the post) this: "xxxxx".
It already has 7 applicants.

-- cross posted from Twitter.