Cyberattack? Espionage operation? Digital data of state actors are prone to misinterpretation! That's why @cyberpeace1 and Christian Reuter from PEASEC Darmstadt propose a technical transparency concept that serves to de-escalate those conflict situations:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42597-023-00099-7
Preventing the escalation of cyber conflicts: towards an approach to plausibly assure the non-involvement in a cyberattack - Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung
While cyberspace has evolved into a commonly shared space vital to our individual lives and societies, malicious cyber activities by state actors as part of espionage operations, regarding defense strategies, or as part of traditional conflicts have strongly increased. In contrast, attributing the origin of such activities remains problematic. The ambiguity of digital data raises the problem of misinterpreting available information, increasing the risk of misinformed reactions and conflict escalation. In order to reduce this risk, this paper proposes a transparency system based on technologies which usually already exist for IT security measures that an accused actor in a specific incident can use to provide credible information which plausibly assures his non-involvement. The paper analyses the technical requirements, presents the technical concept and discusses the necessary adjustments to existing IT networks for its implementation. Intended as a measure for conflict de-escalation, the paper further discusses the limitations of this approach, especially with regard to technical limits as well as the political motivation and behavior of states.