Harry

@Ajay_gnk
3 Followers
10 Following
10 Posts
Why do I need one to be here😢, not looking for hook ups 🙇

So three findings emerge:

1. That the 1949 installation of idols was illegal
2. That the 1992 demolition was illegal.
3. No evidence that Babri masjid was build by *demolishing* a temple.

Who is the wronged and who is the wrongdoer again?

So much discussion on #BirdSite about who the authors are of the Ayodhya judgment.

Font preferences and formatting preferences certainly contain a clue.

The lead judgment is likely authored (or atleast compiled-in-chief) by Justice Chandrachud.

The addendum is likely authored by Justice Ashok Bhushan

@Gargron I made you, I made Mastodon and I made cats. You follow and boost cats on Mastodon, but you don't follow or boost me. You're turning into Jack.
@Deepsealioness @Bloodyatheist
Just did.
Enjoy the Jar😋
How many of you remember @Bloodyatheist or Atheist Blood from Twitter? He left when he got suspended multiple times for calling out sanghis. Now here he is on mastadon and excited to connect with old and new folks . Do follow him, one of the kindest person I know (okay he has promised to get me whiskey 🥃 so help me get my whiskey by following him 🤣😭)
I have no problem with your desire to worship Ram Lalla Virajman. However his "next friend" and the friend's gangs are definitely problematic

Every relative I've spoken to about the verdict had the same reaction.

"100% expected but still disappointed"

We have all collectively lost hope in the justice system.

The Telegraph nails it
This from the ever unfettered Laxman