So three findings emerge:
1. That the 1949 installation of idols was illegal
2. That the 1992 demolition was illegal.
3. No evidence that Babri masjid was build by *demolishing* a temple.
Who is the wronged and who is the wrongdoer again?
So three findings emerge:
1. That the 1949 installation of idols was illegal
2. That the 1992 demolition was illegal.
3. No evidence that Babri masjid was build by *demolishing* a temple.
Who is the wronged and who is the wrongdoer again?
So much discussion on #BirdSite about who the authors are of the Ayodhya judgment.
Font preferences and formatting preferences certainly contain a clue.
The lead judgment is likely authored (or atleast compiled-in-chief) by Justice Chandrachud.
The addendum is likely authored by Justice Ashok Bhushan
Every relative I've spoken to about the verdict had the same reaction.
"100% expected but still disappointed"
We have all collectively lost hope in the justice system.